On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 10:22 AM, dashman <[email protected]> wrote: > but if the code is decompiled, will the decompiler be able to assign xxx to > a PackageManager variable.
Yes, the person reading the decompiled code will see that what you refer to as xxx is a PackageManager. The name xxx is obscured, but not its type. > packageInfo.signatures; > > i understand packageInfo will be modified by proguard - what about > signatures property. Since that class definition does not exist in your project, ProGuard cannot change it. > if nothing is done about that - the user could just search for that keyword. Correct. -- Mark Murphy (a Commons Guy) http://commonsware.com | http://github.com/commonsguy http://commonsware.com/blog | http://twitter.com/commonsguy _The Busy Coder's Guide to Android Development_ Version 4.6 Available! -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
