This SO post gives a pretty good explanation about why you shouldn't use Vector: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1386275/why-is-java-vector-class-considered-obsolete-or-deprecated
Thanks, Justin Anderson MagouyaWare Developer http://sites.google.com/site/magouyaware On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 4:37 PM, Lew <[email protected]> wrote: > Piren wrote: > >> Are you sure we're talking about Android here? What's wrong with Vector? >> ArrayList is good for most occasions but Vector has its merits... you got >> it wrong >> > > Of course. 'Vector' carries cruft that isn't part of the Collections > framework, and 99% of the time you don't > want its naive synchronization. > > >> regarding the SimpleAdapter anyhow (they use any implementation of List, >> which Vector is.. they dont need ArrayList... the description saying it >> needs an ArrayList is a mistake). >> > > I go by the documentation. So sue me. Anyway, you don't refute my point, > which is that there is nothing > in the docs to indicate you might want to use crappy ol' 'Vector'. > > >> Vector isn't really dead...It can make things simple if you want to deal >> with concurrency easily. >> > > Not true. It can give the *illusion* of simplicity without solving your > real concurrency problems. > > For better control, don't use 'Vector', use > 'Collections.synchronizedList()' or one of the 'java.util.concurrent' > or related types. > > >> Stack is also a subclass of it, so those should count as well :) >> > > Right. Don't use 'Stack' either. > > >> Also, how is Hashtable obsolete for android development? you got any >> better alternative for its purposes? I think you're thinking of the C# >> classes which are rather obsolete replaced by Dictionary and List... but >> unless he's a Mono developer, he's using Java :) >> > > WTF? Why are you ranting about Mono? That's damn random of you. > > 'java.util.HashMap' has been the preferred alternative since 1998. When > did you start to learn Java? > > Lew wrote: >> >>> bob wrote: >>> >>>> It sounds like he may want to call *Collections.sort()* on the backing >>>> collection. Probably a *Vector*. >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>> Why do you say "probably" a 'Vector'? The standard Android classes that >>> use a collection include >>> http://developer.android.com/**reference/android/widget/** >>> SimpleAdapter.html<http://developer.android.com/reference/android/widget/SimpleAdapter.html> >>> that uses 'ArrayList', not 'Vector'. I was not able in a brief search to >>> find anything in the Android docs >>> that would lead a person to use 'Vector'. >>> >>> It is striking to me how much pernicious life the 'Vector' class has >>> even fifteen years after it was declared obsolete. >>> >>> Ditto 'Hashtable' but somewhat less so. >>> >> > -- > Lew > > > -- > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Android Developers" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected] > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Android Developers" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > > > -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
