Okay, great, I'll pass a large region to check.

On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 5:01 AM, Mike Reed <r...@google.com> wrote:

>
> By bug, I mean I would like to relax the restriction, and allow you to
> pass null. I don't know yet when the could get in. Thus you should
> always (for now) pass in  a region as the clip. It can be something
> large with no downside (i.e. -10,000, .... 10,000)
>
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 3:57 PM, David Hu <vistoda...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Thanks for your explanation, Mike.  So, if there is not a bug,  I can
> pass
> > the outer rect  as clip region to attain my aim, and:
> > Region rgn  = new Region();
> >      (1)  //----- actual result: The application will crash here with an
> > exception here
> >            //------expect result : ?
> >            rgn.setPath(p, null);
> >       (2)  //----- actual result: The region is the rect area which
> encircle
> > the rotated
> >             rect, not the rotated rect itself
> >             //-------expect result :?
> >             rgn.setPath(p, rgn);
> >       (3) //-----  actual result: The region is the rect area which
> encircle
> > the rotated
> > rect, not the rotated rect itself
> >           //------- expect result: The region should be a complicate
> > area, inclined rect clipped by the original rect
> >          Region clipRgn = new Region(top, bottom, left, right);
> >          mRgn2.setPath(p, clipRgn);
> >  I'll try to use outer rect region as the clip region later, see what's
> > happen currently. Would you please tell me when this region bug can be
> > fixed? I need try to check if my project can catch up the schedule,
> > otherwise, I have to try to calculate this region by ourselves, it would
> > take more efforts.
> >
> >   BR,
> >   -David
> > On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 10:49 PM, Mike Reed <r...@google.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Ah, that's a bug, null should be allowed. I'll see what can be done
> >> there for the future.
> >>
> >> The clip parameter is mean to be a hint to speedup turning the path
> >> into a region by restricting the result to a clipped subset of the
> >> path. For your purposes, you can just make a big rectangular region
> >> for the clip. The bounds of the path or larger.
> >>
> >> On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 10:22 PM, David Hu <vistoda...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> >      Thanks for your reply, Mike. I've tried your method, seems still
> >> > not
> >> > work yet. The second parameter of Region.setPath (clip) can't be null.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >     If we use null, there will be an exception happen. So I've tried
> to
> >> > use
> >> > the region I've just constructed or the original rect region, the area
> >> > is
> >> > still the ourter standard rect area, not the inclined rect which
> rotated
> >> > from a standard rect. Here is my code tip and possible result:
> >> >
> >> >      //Calculate region
> >> >      top = 150;
> >> >      bottom = top + bmp.getHeight(); //bmp is a bitmap instance
> >> >      left = 200;
> >> >      right = left + bmp.getWidth();
> >> >      Path p = new Path();
> >> >      p.addRect(left, top, right, bottom, Path.Direction.CCW);
> >> >
> >> > // use Matrix to rotate 30 degrees
> >> >      Matrix mtx = new Matrix();
> >> >      mtx.setRotate(30);
> >> >      p.transform(mtx);
> >> >
> >> >      Region rgn  = new Region();
> >> >      (1)  //----- The application will crash here with an exception
> here
> >> >      rgn.setPath(p, null);
> >> >      (2)  //----- The region is the rect area which encircle the
> rotated
> >> > rect, not the rotated rect itself
> >> >      rgn.setPath(p, rgn);
> >> >      (3) //-----  The region is the rect area which encircle the
> rotated
> >> > rect, not the rotated rect itself
> >> >          Region clipRgn = new Region(top, bottom, left, right);
> >> >          mRgn2.setPath(p, clipRgn);
> >> > BTW, I searched in android source code and www.google.com, can't find
> >> > any
> >> > usage of this API:
> >> >
> >> > public boolean setPath(Path path, Region clip)
> >> >
> >> > So now, my question is which clip region should I pass or any other
> way
> >> > in
> >> > order to attain my aim? Hope I've made my aim clearly.
> >> >
> >> > BR,
> >> > -David
> >> >
> >> > On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 11:27 PM, Mike Reed <r...@google.com> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> You could possibly un-rotate your touch-point by 30 degrees, and then
> >> >> just use the rectangle.
> >> >>
> >> >> However, you can make complex regions by first constructing a Path,
> >> >> and then calling region.setPath(...), which converts the path into a
> >> >> region. Below is pseudo sample code:
> >> >>
> >> >> Path p = new Path();
> >> >> p.addRect(rect);    // this is your rect
> >> >> p.transform(matrix); // construct a matrix and then rotate as you
> wish
> >> >> region.setPath(p, null);
> >> >>
> >> >> On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 5:01 AM,  <vistoda...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >   I want to judge whether the touch point(x, y) is in a region or
> >> >> > not, the region is from a stardard rect by rotating specified
> >> >> > degrees,
> >> >> > from example, rotate 30 degrees. There is a class named Region in
> >> >> > Android, but as I researched, it just supports standard rect, is
> >> >> > there
> >> >> > any other way to judge whether a point is in an  acclivitous rect?
> >> >> > How
> >> >> > to do it?
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Br,
> >> >> > -David
> >> >> > >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >>
> >
>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Android Developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
android-developers-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to