I meant to reply earlier, didn't get a chance. Something you may (or may not) find amusing. So far, google has only assumed their OWN EMPLOYEES are thieves. (Yes, they've said the same restrictions are in the unreleased adp1.1 image, but since its unreleased that could still change..)
There is NO image for the adp1 that allows paid OR protected apps (including free-protected and paid-unprotected). The holiday image is for google employees only, on the phones they received instead of a bonus last year. So..yeah. Google has acted to indicate that they believe, given the chance, their employees will steal applications. (Funny, and kinda sad. Although they'd be getting just as much of a roasting if they had gone the other way with it.) On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 2:08 PM, Eric Veenendaal <e...@ericveenendaal.com>wrote: > > I just wanted to start a thread expressing my displeasure with the > choice to block copy-protected apps from being made available to > ADPs. The thing that drew me to the android platform was the fact > that it had such a lower barrier to entry. I can't afford to have two > phone plans going. The idea of investing $425 to allow me to have one > device to both develop for and use for my day to day life was very > attractive. However, Google's recent assumption that developers will > pirate drm'd software simply because they can is ridiculous. If > someone wanted to pirate software, they'd simply open a t-mobile > account, unlock the phone, and save $300+. I hope Google reconsiders. > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
