Thanks for the suggestion (and yes, your guess is spot-on - we'll try rearranging it next time we have the covers off).
But I don't think that changes the point - this app is not insanely badly-written as it stands, and it is already tripping over the stack- depth problem. Scratching about looking for ways to use less stack, and to avoid complicated view structures, doesn't feel very 2009. Nor does it feel like a good use of our time. R, On Apr 24, 4:21 pm, Mark Murphy <mmur...@commonsware.com> wrote: > jarkman wrote: > > Well, it didn't seem insane on 1.1, and it ran happily enough. Let me > > break it down for you, and see if it makes any more sense. > > > From the top, in HierarchyViewer, reading down the deepest path, we > > go: > > > PhoneWindow$DecorView > > LinearLayout > > FrameLayout > > TabHost > > LinearLayout (comes with the TabHost) > > FrameLayout (comes with the TabHost) > > PhoneWindow$DecorView > > FrameLayout (for this tab) > > LinearLayout > > FrameLayout (also holds a loading-progress gizmo) > > FastScrollView > > ListView > > RelativeLayout (for the list item) > > OurPhotoView > > ImageView > > My guess from this list is that are using the embed-an-activity-in-a-tab > stuff, which is why you get the second PhoneWindow$DecorView and, > possibly, the subsequent FrameLayout. > > If my guess is correct, you could alter your application to not use > activities in this fashion and save 1-2 levels in your view hierarchy. > Populate your tabs via Views (possibly using the factory pattern for a > faster initial open) instead of activities. > > -- > Mark Murphy (a Commons > Guy)http://commonsware.com|http://twitter.com/commonsguy > > Warescription: Three Android Books, Plus Updates, $35/Year --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
