On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 5:13 PM, Mr.No <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> Thx.
> Second Question:
> Is Android missing some of the Linux OS komponents or technologies?
> because it was designed for embedded devices.
>

I'm not sure I understand the question, but I'm tempted to say yes.

More specifically, many design decisions relate to about 5 years ago,
where the target embedded system was even slower and smaller than an
HTC Dream, and many Linux "components" were still too weak/buggy to
be considered a good foundation for the system.

Starting from scratch today would probably give different results, but it
would take
a few years to get a commercial product, etc...

Just life as usual in the embedded software development world :-)


>
> On 31 Jul., 12:17, David Turner <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 11:20 AM, Mr.No <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > > the Android OS was designed for the ARM Architecture, am i right?
> > > and the conclusion is that the android os runs only on computers with
> > > a ARM processor architecture?
> >
> > The Android OS sources can already compile and run as ARM and x86 machine
> > code.
> >
> > Some people have reported success porting them to MIPS and the SuperH
> > architectures as well.
> >
> > While the MIPS port seems to be still proprietary at this point, the
> SuperH
> > one has already been
> > contributed to r.android.com (and is actively being reviewed at that
> point).
> >
> > Hope this helps :-)
> >
> >
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Android Developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to