You understood it correctly. That level of granularity is not available.
Yusuf Saib Android ·T· · ·Mobile· stick together The views, opinions and statements in this email are those of the author solely in their individual capacity, and do not necessarily represent those of T-Mobile USA, Inc. On Sep 1, 10:26 am, salza <[email protected]> wrote: > well, but with that method I can not say "give a minimum of 50 MHz to > thread A" > prioritized threads are always dependant from the other threads that > have priorizations - i can not grant a minimum of bandwidth to a > thread. > > or have I not understood it correctly? > > On Sep 1, 1:38 pm, CraigsRace <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > android.os.Process.setThreadPriority > > (android.os.Process.THREAD_PRIORITY_...); > > > On Sep 1, 8:10 pm, salza <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Well, does maybe someone have an alternative idea how I could solve > > > that in another way? > > > > On Aug 28, 9:08 am, salza <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Does Android provide a facility to ensure certain applications and/or > > > > threads receive a minimum of CPU bandwidth (and other apps/threads are > > > > prevented from consuming all the CPU bandwidth)? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
