RickGillaspy wrote: > I'ts not clear to me where the line between android OS, Google, and > handset makers is.
If it is in the SDK, you can generally rely upon it, with the occasional hiccup (e.g., ARCHOS not setting ANDROID_ID to be a hex value). > -- Included in Android OS. There unless the maker exluded it. > ( contacts, email, etc). > -- Licensed to Google. There if the maker licensed it ( maps, gmail, > etc) > -- Added by makers ( Motoblur, etc.) If it is in the SDK, you can generally rely upon it. Otherwise, do not assume it is there, and code to appropriate abstractions (e.g., generic ACTION_SEND Intents versus assuming the existence of such-and-so email client). > Will Android 2.0 come with a new SDK? Almost assuredly. > If so, when do we get to see it? When they release it. Bear in mind that everything surrounding the Verizon device you mention -- other than what is in their iDon't Flash ad -- is speculation. -- Mark Murphy (a Commons Guy) http://commonsware.com | http://twitter.com/commonsguy _Beginning Android_ from Apress Now Available! --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
