There is android 2.0 the eclair codebase... I believe this is given  
only to certain corporates... Not sure if it available in the repo..

I really wonder why google is not making such news public and I don't  
find a need for setting up private repositories.. Isn't android  
project suppose to be anopen source initiative???

I really wish this trend changes before developers protest and go  
against android development.


Sent from my iPhone

On Oct 23, 2009, at 6:29 AM, Leshell <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> There is no Android 2.0 - I heard this directly from someone at Google
> on the Android team.  He says there is always rumors about Android.
> I'm sure if it were available and it existed, there would not be a
> need for this thread.
>
> 1.6 was just released...  close but no cigar!
>
>
>
> On Oct 22, 1:02 pm, Disconnect <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Droid ships with 2.0 in 2 weeks (or, according to the ads, by the end
>> of November). The current AOSP code is based on 1.6.
>>
>> So .. yeah, there is a 2.0, but no, you can't get it :( The word from
>> OHA members is "this sucks a lot, we can't get it either but its  
>> real"
>> and from googs is "no idea if or when it will hit the open source
>> tree."
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 8:15 PM, hap 497 <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> But that only has the donut code. I think.
>>
>>> I am looking for android 2.0 source.  Any idea? Or I am incorrect?
>>
>>> On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 5:57 PM, Ishwor Gurung  
>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>>> Is it possible to get the android 2.0 source?
>>>> Yes.http://android.git.kernel.org/
>>>> --
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Ishwor Gurung
>
> >

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Android Developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to