I just guess, Whole the services are inside of the same process,(as you
said), no service will be killed by android automatically.

Am I right ? :-)

2009/12/16 Carter <[email protected]>

> *bump*
>
> Again, the question is: if there are multiple services within a
> process and at least one service is a "foreground" service, will that
> keep the non-foreground services alive?
>
>
> Thanks,
> Carter
>
> The documentation
>
> On Nov 23, 10:40 pm, Carter <[email protected]> wrote:
> > This is probably a question for Dianne:
> >
> > The Android 2.0 SDK introduces the startForeground() API which makes
> > it much less likely that a background service (and therefore a given
> > process) will be killed.
> >
> > Suppose there are two services within a process, and one of those
> > services has called startForeground() while the other has not.  Will
> > the one foreground service "protect" the other non-foreground service
> > from being killed?
> >
> > I'm specifically looking at a case where there could be multiple
> > services within a process, but coming from different APKs.  So these
> > would be APKs signed with the same signature, and given the same
> > sharedUserID and process in the Android Manifest.  I'd like to avoid
> > having to post a notification for each individual service, as that
> > would likely annoy users.
> >
> > Thanks!
> > Carter
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Android Developers" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]<android-developers%[email protected]>
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Android Developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en

Reply via email to