On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 10:20 AM, gudujarlson <[email protected]> wrote: > I have been perplexed by the lack of a library concept since my first > look at Android.
The reality of it hit me when I built a free version of my paid app. > It seems the Android designers viewed the library > concept as unnecessary. In it's place we have activities, services, > broadcast receivers, and content providers. However, either I am > subborn to new ideas or these concepts are not a full replacement for > libraries, because I have not been able to find solutions to my > problems. It would be extremely useful for those of us with apps that have both free and non-free versions. You can't count on the user to keep the free version once they buy the non-free, so in my particular case the services, broadcast receivers, and content providers aren't a good replacement for a shared library. -- Greg Donald http://destiney.com/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
