jotobjects wrote: > Note I didn't say you said that. It is good to keep this forum from > degenerating to personal swipes as this particular thread tended to go > that way :)
Sorry, I didn't mean for the reply to sound nasty. I tend to get taken out of context a bit and so got a bit overly nervous. > Again, IMHO this is the kind of convention that ideally would be > adhered to and documented. Unfortunately, this sort of documentation is only truly practical for the core Android team. It's their apparent convention, and only they can officially say what is and is not considered part of the SDK. You or I can only attempt to steer people in directions of hopeful success. > For instance in the Java API you can count on java.* and > javax.*classes being part of the pubic API (and that is documented at > least indirectly that these are reserved package names). Conversely > you can be sure that com.sun.* classes are NOT part of the public API > and they should be used with caution and rarely. Precisely! -- Mark Murphy (a Commons Guy) http://commonsware.com | http://twitter.com/commonsguy _Android Programming Tutorials_ Version 1.1 Available! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
