swapnil:

I dont understand the code that Romain posted. Would you like to help
me out, sending some code if you have a "modal dialag" as you were
looking for? I'd appreciate it =)

Regards,
Ted


On 4 Jan, 11:51, swapnil kamble <[email protected]> wrote:
> Thanks Dianne for your nice explanation. I have used synchronization point
> between two threads with a timeout value. Its smoothly working for me.
>
> Thanks Romain for pointing me to CounterDownLatch.
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 2:14 AM, Dianne Hackborn <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 2:39 AM, swapnil kamble 
> > <[email protected]>wrote:
>
> >> Have you used MessageBox.show() API in Windows ? If yes then you can
> >> understand it easily what I am saying.
>
> > This is API is not really blocking the thread -- it is running a nested
> > event loop, until the user responds to the dialog.  This kind of behavior is
> > very deliberately not implemented in Android because it results in poor
> > application interaction behavior and edge cases, which is especially
> > problematic in an environment like a cell phone when an application must
> > be interruptible at any time.
>
> > For example, if your application is sitting there blocking its main thread
> > like this, and the user receives an incoming call or handles a notification,
> > what do you think should happen?  If we try to pause the activity while in
> > this state to move on to the next thing, we will end up calling
> > Activity.onPause() and all kinds of other questionable stuff while nested
> > down inside of your app.  Or if you have a broadcast receiver for, say, the
> > device going to sleep, this code would end up being called from deep in your
> > "blocking" method call.  In all of these cases, it is unlikely for the
> > application to really expect this to happen.
>
> > These kinds of nested event loops are just bad news.  PalmOS was the king
> > example of the horror they cause, but even Windows suffers from it -- all
> > those apps that get in weird unresponsive states while waiting on a dialog?
> >  MessageBox is often to blame.
>
> > My strong suggestion: re-arrange your code to not do this kind of thing.
> >  You have some method that needs to get input from the user to return a
> > response?  Make that method async as well, to return its result in a
> > callback, because if it needs to wait for the user then that is truly what
> > it is.
>
> > --
> > Dianne Hackborn
> > Android framework engineer
> > [email protected]
>
> > Note: please don't send private questions to me, as I don't have time to
> > provide private support, and so won't reply to such e-mails.  All such
> > questions should be posted on public forums, where I and others can see and
> > answer them.
>
> >  --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > Groups "Android Developers" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > [email protected]<android-developers%2Bunsubs 
> > [email protected]>
> > For more options, visit this group at
> >http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
>
> --
> ...Swapnil
>
> || Hare Krishna Hare Krishna Krishna Krishna Hare Hare ||
> || Hare Rama    Hare Rama   Rama   Rama    Hare Hare ||
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Android Developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en

Reply via email to