Thanks Bob,

I will defiantly review my layout strategy.


--
Best Regards,
Atif Gulzar

I ◘◘◘◘ Unicode, ɹɐzlnƃ ɟıʇɐ



On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 9:41 PM, Bob Kerns <[email protected]> wrote:

> Atif, the various layout classes are *intended* to be a generic
> solution, making minor adjustments for minor changes.
>
> Using different resource folders is intended for making major
> readjustments to layout. If you design a good layout with the layout
> classes, you may not need them at all!
>
> Generally, separate resource folders are useful for when a particular
> layout strategy simply breaks down when pushed too far. For example,
> rotating to landscape may make the screen simply too short for one
> strategy, but if you move a couple of things to the side, you're OK.
>
> If you need to distinguish between 480x800 and 480x854 -- and
> especially if it's 480x854 that has the problem -- then I would
> strongly suggest that you take a close look at your layout strategies.
> LinearLayout with some expandable padding elements, TableLayout, or
> the use of a 9-patch instead of a fixed background graphic.
>
> Android offers a lot of facilities for handling of layout differences.
> I don't think they're always as easy to use and predictable as they
> ought to be, but they're pretty rich and functional, none-the-less.
>
> So if they aren't doing the job, and you're having to rely on
> differentiating your layouts at the level of 480x800 vs 480x854, then
> to get any help, you're going to need to precisely identify what
> problem the layouts aren't handling for you automatically, and why.
>
> My guess, however, would be that you're either:
> 1) Trying to put too much stuff onto each screen. This makes your
> layouts very "brittle", and usually makes the result seem very
> cluttered for the user, as well. There can be times when this is
> appropriate -- for example, when the goal is a single-screen status
> monitoring display. But generally, the strategy here should be to move
> to less-cluttered, more tightly focused screens.
>
> 2) Trying to keep too tight a control on the layouts, rather than
> defining a logical layout strategy, and allowing the system to make
> the layout choices for you, within defined ranges. That does take both
> a lot of understanding, and a lot of testing to identify the usable
> limits of each layout strategy. But the result is that you won't have
> to specify a new layout to handle some new device that adds another 54
> pixels along one edge.
>
> On Jan 26, 5:10 am, Atif Gulzar <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Thanks Dianne Hackborn,
> >
> > But then how one can set its single layout to work on all aspect rations.
> To
> > solve the problem for long screens; I created a new folder layout-long
> and
> > adjusted my lauouts. Wel it solved the problem for 480x800 but not for
> > 480x854. Any generic solution ??
> >
> > --
> > Best Regards,
> > Atif Gulzar
> >
> > I ◘◘◘◘ Unicode, ɹɐzlnƃ ɟıʇɐ
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 11:06 PM, Dianne Hackborn <[email protected]
> >wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > > Density and aspect ratio are completely unrelated.  Density is the size
> of
> > > the pixels, and we currently only support square pixels (which is what
> all
> > > current devices have as far as I know).  The aspect ratio is determined
> by
> > > the number of pixels in th x and y dimensions, regardless of their
> density.
> >
> > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 7:04 AM, Atif Gulzar <[email protected]
> >wrote:
> >
> > >> We can set the pixel values in custom views by multiplying them with
> >
> > >> this.getResources().getDisplayMetrics().density;
> >
> > >> This is ok when the screen aspect ratio is normal means not long
> >
> > >> But how can we set the pixels along Y-axis when the aspect ration is
> long.
> >
> > >> --
> > >> Best Regards,
> > >> Atif Gulzar
> >
> > >> I ◘◘◘◘ Unicode, ɹɐzlnƃ ɟıʇɐ
> >
> > >>  --
> > >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > >> Groups "Android Developers" group.
> > >> To post to this group, send email to
> [email protected]
> > >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > >> [email protected]<android-developers%[email protected]><android-developers%2Bunsubs
> [email protected]>
> > >> For more options, visit this group at
> > >>http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
> >
> > > --
> > > Dianne Hackborn
> > > Android framework engineer
> > > [email protected]
> >
> > > Note: please don't send private questions to me, as I don't have time
> to
> > > provide private support, and so won't reply to such e-mails.  All such
> > > questions should be posted on public forums, where I and others can see
> and
> > > answer them.
> >
> > >  --
> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > > Groups "Android Developers" group.
> > > To post to this group, send email to
> [email protected]
> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > [email protected]<android-developers%[email protected]><android-developers%2Bunsubs
> [email protected]>
> > > For more options, visit this group at
> > >http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Android Developers" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]<android-developers%[email protected]>
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Android Developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en

Reply via email to