Done! Thanks, Pete
On Jan 30, 11:13 pm, joebowbeer <[email protected]> wrote: > You should file a documentation bug and submit a patch for review. > > For example: > > http://code.google.com/p/android/issues/detail?id=895 > > On Jan 29, 9:27 pm, pcockerell <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi there > > > In the Dev Guide section on Building Custom Components (http:// > > developer.android.com/guide/topics/ui/custom-components.html), we > > read: > > > * It is static, meaning it does not generate the so-called "synthetic > > methods" that allow it to access data from the parent class, which in > > turn means that it really behaves as a separate class rather than > > something strongly related to NoteEditor. This is a cleaner way to > > create inner classes if they do not need access to state from the > > outer class, keeps the generated class small, and allows it to be used > > easily from other classes. > > > This mischaracterizes the difference between static and non-static > > (inner) nested classes. The generation of synthetic methods is not > > related to whether the class is static or not, but to the visibility > > of the object being accessed in the "other" class (it works both from > > inner to outer and vice versa). If the outer (inner) class defines a > > private method or field, then when it's accessed from within the inner > > (outer) class, a hidden accessor method will be generated on the outer > > (inner) class to cross the "private" boundary. Of course, if the inner > > class is static, the outer field or method being accessed would also > > have to be static. > > > Making the nested class static does not in itself avoid the generation > > of any synthetic methods: if any of them are private, those accessors > > will be generated regardless. What a non-static nested class DOES > > generate is a hidden reference to the outer instance, in order for its > > fields and methods to be accessed, but that access doesn't require the > > generation of synthetic methods unless their visibility demands it. > > > It's a small but important error in the documentation, and it would be > > nice to see it fixed. > > > Cheers, > > Pete -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
