On Mar 21, 7:34 pm, Bob Kerns <[email protected]> wrote: > Actually, mine runs as part of the normal build process too. Using ant > builder instead of a program builder gives you full cross-platform > compatibility. We're both adding builders, just different types. > > Either one will work fine. But I recommend an ant builder over a > program builder, because there are always other reasons that come > along to have an ant script -- for example, production builds with > tagging, etc. You can also set up other tasks to perform besides > builds. > > [ ... ]
Thanks. I'll take your advice. When I have some time, I'll try to redo my procedure under ant, if for no other reason than to learn how to do it in an Eclipse environment (I've used ant before, but never under Eclipse). By the way, one thing I noticed is that in the non-ant enviroment, it's hard (impossible?) for me to get the dependencies right. I only want my class to get auto-generated when strings.xml has changed. I know that managing dependencies like that is trivial under ant. Also, I can't figure out how to get my auto-generated class to refresh in the IDE after it gets re-created. I have to select Refresh or hit F5 in order for any changes to be noticed. If I use ant, will I be able to force the refresh as part of the build? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscribegooglegroups.com or reply to this email with the words "REMOVE ME" as the subject.
