I've reimplemented tons of APIs when they didn't work.

But it occurs to me now that this could simply be a documentation
error.

-90 and 270 are equivalent.  I assumed the OP knows that, and was
still unhappy with the result. Perhaps he wants to verify the result.
A bit of googling and a calculator will suffice.

The documentation SAYS that it returns it in degrees east of true
north, which *I* interpret as being the positive number of degrees you
have to turn to the east to get to that bearing.

I also claim that's what it SHOULD return, for various minor reasons.
But the only critical thing is that it BE CLEARLY DOCUMENTED and
BEHAVE AS DOCUMENTED.

I haven't tried it myself, but if he's right, it fails one of those.

In any event, even if the API is working as designed, I think a bug
report is in order; the ambiguity in the doc at a minimum should be
fixed.

On Jun 14, 1:40 am, MobDev <[email protected]> wrote:
> This obviously is all true,
> BUT why re-invent the wheel ? I mean if there is an implemented method
> which should offer that functionality the most logical thing is to use
> that one instead of writing your own methods.. Or did you guys also
> rewrote all other API's as well ?
> Why even supply ANY API's at all then ? ;)
>
> On 14 jun, 08:40, Bob Kerns <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > I don't know if I would term anything to do with spherical trig as
> > "easy", exactly, even with my background in math.
>
> > On the other hand, it's simple to program, once you know the right
> > theorems. This is well covered in any serious textbook on nautical
> > navigation.
>
> > On Jun 13, 10:00 pm, Frank Weiss <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > Why not do it yourself? The math is easy - Google is your friend: get
> > > bearing between two lat longs

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Android Developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en

Reply via email to