Check out this https://www.obopay.com/consumer/Welcome.do
On Mar 17, 9:55 am, YA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Vipin: > > IMS is a architecture that sits over GSM, and 3G and LTE are both > extensions of GSM infrastructure. So, yes, I think for another decade > we are stuck with GSM. In the US and Korea, CDMA is strong, and > another possible contender to GSM is WiMax. But for now, the choice is > not this great. > > You can run SIP over any data network, of course, but if the operator > is bypassed, there is a lot they can do to stop it and lock the long- > distance revenue back into their system. Look, just last week iPhone > SDK was released with a caveat that there will be absolutely, > positively NO program access for VoIP to anything except Wi-Fi. > > YA > > On Mar 16, 2:33 pm, Vipin Kumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > YA, > > > I believe we should always welcome thoughts/ideas. I agree there could be > > problems in implementing ideas, but there can solution/workarounds for that. > > Do you think GSM going to stay forever. Look at the developments in mobile > > standard IMS/3G/LTE(4G). Consider IMS for example where operators are dying > > to get a new application on their SIP Application Server and there are not > > much applications available at the moment. One may think of implementing > > core network part of the application if application requires that, So let us > > not discourage people to bring their thoughts/ideas/opinions to the > > community forum. > > > -Vipin > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [email protected] > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of YA > > Sent: 16 March 2008 11:11 > > To: Android Discuss > > Subject: [android-discuss] Re: Micro payments in Android as standard > > > Tristan: > > > GSM core is NOT a commercial structure, it is a technological architecture > > that causes certain commercial implications. The reference provided by > > Wikipedia is perhaps not the best but is quite good for getting basic > > knowledge of it. Learning implies not just being told everything but also > > reading and generally doing a bit of homework. > > > YA > > > On Mar 15, 9:21 pm, Tristan Brotherton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > YA, > > > > Sure he doesn't know much about the commercial structure of networks, > > > but that is what these groups are for. To learn. > > > > On Mar 14, 3:50 pm, YA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Nanard: > > > > > it is even more important you learn how GSM core network works > > > > before you start contemplating operator-dependent features. > > > > >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GSM_core_network > > > > > Learn the helloworld first. > > > > > YA > > > > > On Mar 14, 3:44 pm, Nanard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > It's true I don't know online payment. > > > > > > I try to find a new feature which could be provided by Android > > > > > SDK, and some reason to create such feature. It was the subject > > > > > of this topic. > > > > > > So people participating in the Challenge will have more freedom to > > > > > implement new kind/killer applications. > > > > > > I have finished with this topic, I think. I won't disturb you more. > > > > > > On 14 mar, 13:28, YA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > Nanard: > > > > > > > you make TOO many assumptions about both the way mobile > > > > > > operators work and the way online payments work. This is not > > constructive. > > > > > > > YA > > > > > > > On Mar 13, 7:49 pm, Nanard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > I'm not a commercial guy. But I think they have some good at > > > > > > > Google (the boss for instance). > > > > > > > > If gPhone are the **only** phone which give the freedom to > > > > > > > exchange > > > > > > > **real** money between **regular** people : Carrier should be > > > > > > > pleased to sell those kind of phones ! > > > > > > > They also don't have to create, maintain, have content for > > > > > > > commercial web sites ! > > > > > > > > Google & Carrier could for instance take 1 cents each for > > > > > > > every money echange between the users : less than PayPal. > > > > > > > It should be enough : there's more cellular phone user's than > > > > > > > PayPal users. > > > > > > > > On 13 mar, 13:13, YA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > You need to convince most carriers then to process your > > > > > > > > payments. How are you going to do this? > > > > > > > > > On Mar 12, 11:46 am, Nanard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Micro payments does not sound as a bad idea but for > > > > > > > > > > starters I rather Android adopts a similar model as > > > > > > > > > > IPhone where a user can just go to an Android store to buy > > androind applications. > > > > > > > > > > It's not 'revolutionary' :-) > > > > > > > > > Every phone today can do that : buy stuff on Carrier's store. > > > > > > > > > > My idea was a bit like a port of PayPal : to enable > > > > > > > > > payment between people. > > > > > > > > > But as a standard gPhone feature (API in SDK). > > > > > > > > > And without the need to create PayPal account. Most phone > > > > > > > > > users in the world have an account with their Carrier , > > > > > > > > > don't care about computer stuff, and don't know about > > > > > > > > > PayPal.- Masquer le texte des messages précédents - > > > > > > > > > - Afficher le texte des messages précédents -- Masquer le > > > > > > > > texte des messages précédents - > > > > > > > - Afficher le texte des messages précédents - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-discuss?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
