"All Applications are created Equal"

holds true for all applications created on top of Application Framework.

It does not mean that the applications created will be open or free!

take care,
Muthu Ramadoss.

http://linkedin.com/in/tellibitz +91-9840348914
http://mobeegal.in - mobile search. redefined.



On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 7:51 PM, aayush <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> The adage that all applications are created equal cannot hold true in
> a real commercial rollout by a carrier.
>
> Carriers would want to achieve service differentiation and a
> competitive edge over their peers. So they would always want to lock
> down some apps to provide them to only their customers.
> If all applications would be equal, what value proposition will they
> show to their customers ?
>
> So i think, that this statement of application equality does not hold
> good....no matter how good the intentions may be..the carriers wont
> tolerate it !
>
> Aayush
>
> Muthu Ramadoss wrote:
> > I guess "All applications are created equal" will hold true when you roll
> > out your own custom Android implementation. If we consider the G1
> > implementation of Android, of course the Carrier is going to lock down a
> lot
> > of Apps which the Carrier believes is important enough to be locked down
> for
> > various reasons.
> >
> >
> > take care,
> > Muthu Ramadoss.
> >
> > http://linkedin.com/in/tellibitz +91-9840348914
> > http://androidrocks.googlecode.com - Android Tutorial.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 5:17 PM, Al Sutton <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Debate on the policy is another (probably lengthy) discussion, the fact
> > > is that the policy exists and because of that all apps are not equal as
> > > the OHA site claim that "All applications are created equal" doesn't
> > > hold up.
> > >
> > > Al.
> > >
> > > Shane Isbell wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 3:27 AM, Al Sutton <[email protected]
> > > > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >     They would need stretch that somewhat and define the dialler
> > > >     application
> > > >     as non-core for that to work in relation to the block on third
> party
> > > >     diallers calling emergency services.
> > > >
> > > > This is one area I agree with Google on. If there is a hostile app,
> > > > dialing out false emergency requests, clogging the system, people
> > > > could die. Of course, Google deserves all the other crap you give
> > > > them, so keep swinging. Maybe some candy will fall out.
> > > >
> > > > Shane
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > ======
> > > Funky Android Limited is registered in England & Wales with the
> > > company number  6741909. The registered head office is Kemp House,
> > > 152-160 City Road, London,  EC1V 2NX, UK.
> > >
> > > The views expressed in this email are those of the author and not
> > > necessarily those of Funky Android Limited, it's associates, or it's
> > > subsidiaries.
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Android Discuss" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/android-discuss?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to