My G1 does not think for itself, therefore there is no AI. We are correcting you as you are wrong, just like you asked.
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 5:37 PM, jtaylor <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Jan 12, 12:24 pm, Al Sutton <[email protected]> wrote: > > AI? I don't believe "enabling AI" has ever been in the top 10 goals for > > Android, and I've not seen any AI algorithms mentioned anywhere. > > > > Remember Android is for set-top Boxes and Netbooks, etc. > > > - Juan T. > > > Whats wrong with the OHA definition of "Android is a complete mobile > > phone software stack." > > (http://www.openhandsetalliance.com/android_faq.html)? > > > > Al. > > > > jtaylor wrote: > > > Here is my discovery of how I think Android can be defined. Correct me > > > if I am mistaken. > > > > > ---- > > > > > Android is an ecosystem of loosely-coupled components enabling AI in > > > order to simplify complexity that will be built up by competing mini- > > > systems. It is loosely-coupled to the degree that "intents", which > > > represent specific actions to be taken, stand apart as their own > > > component. > > > > > - Juan T. > > > > -- > > ====== > > Funky Android Limited is registered in England & Wales with the > > company number 6741909. The registered head office is Kemp House, > > 152-160 City Road, London, EC1V 2NX, UK. > > > > The views expressed in this email are those of the author and not > > necessarily those of Funky Android Limited, it's associates, or it's > > subsidiaries. > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-discuss?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
