Is better we got the adp early even with some problems . On Feb 23, 2009, at 4:50 PM, Jean-Baptiste Queru <[email protected]> wrote:
The only option to make things happen in "the correct sequence" would have been to not distribute ADP1 as long as images couldn't be available, which means that ADP1 itself still wouldn't currently be available. I'm not convinced that this was a better option, but that's a personal opinion and you're definitely free to disagree with me (even more than usual). JBQ On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 1:32 PM, Jeremy Gray <[email protected]> wrote: Trust me when I tell you that as an industry vet I understand exactly what you are going through. That said, you'll have to forgive me when I point out that the pain you are going through could and should have been avoided by doing things in the correct sequence, one which is not exactly news to anyone in this industry. At the end of the day, as long as Google (and the rest of the organizations behind Android) comes away from this understanding the problem that they have created and prepared to ensure that it never happens again, I'll be happy. Jeremy Gray On Feb 18, 9:47 am, Jean-Baptiste Queru <[email protected]> wrote: You have no idea about the amount of pain that we're going through to get an update out for the ADP1. JBQ -- Jean-Baptiste M. "JBQ" Queru Android Engineer, Google. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-discuss?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
