I'll take ADC2 any day. ADC is fun unlimited.

take care,
Muthu Ramadoss.

http://linkedin.com/in/tellibitz +91.98403.48914
http://androidrocks.googlecode.com - Android Consulting.



On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 9:22 AM, Incognito <[email protected]> wrote:

>
>
> No, I want the challenge. They have plenty of money to do whatever they
> want and 5million $ is nothing. The challenge is a treat to us developers.
> Something that I really enjoy. You are welcome to not participate if you
> don't want to, with all due respect.
>
> So -10^10^10^10 on your sugestion.
>
> On Mar 20, 2009, at 8:46 PM, Inderjeet Singh <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> I would actually prefer if instead of the challenge the same money was
> used to run promotions on the market to help the sales of existing
> paid apps.
> Anyone else feels the same way?
>
> Inder
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 1:09 PM, Mariano Kamp <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> When looking at Apples AppStore it seems that the winners of the categories
> take it all. On top of that also the awards? I am not sure if that is such
> a
> good idea, in particular for the non-US/non-UK developers who cannot
> compete
> in the paid apps segment.
>
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 6:46 AM, Al Sutton <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> To me the best metric of quality and user friendly capabilities is
> people wanting to use the app, hence why I can see a Market position
> based competition making sense.
>
> Al.
>
>
> Ivan Soto wrote:
> If my application sells for like $.99 and the top seller is selling
> around 600 to 1000 a month, a lot of developer would be spending $1500
> just to make themselves to the top. The price would be more than that
> amount.
>
> Just a thought.
>
> I don't like that idea. I really prefer a challenge that favor towards
> the quality and user friendly capabilities.
>
> my 2 cents.
>
>
> Ivan Soto Fernandez
> Web Developer
> http://ivansotof.com
>
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 3:50 PM, Dan Morrill <[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
>    We have considered and are considering ideas along those lines.
>     That is *not* to say that that's what we are going to do, so
>    don't take it as confirmation. :)  But yes, many different
>    structures are on the table.
>
>    - Dan
>
>
>    On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 2:46 PM, Al Sutton <[email protected]
>    <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
>
>        Dan,
>
>        Thanks for the clarification.
>
>        How about making the ADC II a set of awards which are given to
>        the best
>        selling apps in each category each month for the next couple
>        of years.
>        This would allow the Android user community to vote on what is
>        good for
>        them, give developers a reason to push their apps to the limit
>        of what
>        they can do, and allow Google to focus the prizes on groups
>        delivering
>        what people want.
>
>        Just a thought.
>
>        Al.
>
>        Dan Morrill wrote:
>        > Oops.  Looks like that page was collateral damage when we
>        did the move
>        > to developer.android.com <http://developer.android.com>
>        <http://developer.android.com>.  We're
>        > looking into it; thanks for pointing it out.  At any rate
>        the content
>        > that would be there refers only to the first Developer
>        Challenge.
>        >
>        > Regarding the second Developer Challenge, it definitely
>        isn't canceled
>        > but we haven't announced plans for it yet.  We said we would
>        by last
>        > year (sorry about that), but we're still working on how to
>        structure
>        > it.  The world is quite a bit different now than it was when
>        we ran
>        > the first ADC, so we want to make sure the new
>        rules/structure make
>        > sense, and we are of course taking into consideration
> everyone's
>        > experiences with the first ADC.  The second ADC will
>        definitely not be
>        > a clone of the first ADC.
>        >
>        > We expect to have all this finalized and announce rules within
> a
>        > couple months.  The event itself will likely run in the
>        second half of
>        > the year.
>        >
>        > - Dan
>        >
>        > On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 1:07 AM, Al Sutton
>        <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>        > <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>>
>        wrote:
>        >
>        >
>        >     Very very recently though. Googling for "android
>        developer challenge"
>        >     still brings up the 404ed page as the top result.
>        >
>        >     Al.
>        >
>        >     Anonymous Anonymous wrote:
>        >     > http://developer.android.com/
>        >     > try in here.. its moved i guess
>        >     >
>        >     > On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 12:10 PM, Eelke Folmer
>        >     <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>        <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
>        >     > <mailto:[email protected]
>        <mailto:[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]
>        <mailto:[email protected]>>>>
>        >     wrote:
>        >     >
>        >     >
>        >     >     This ( http://code.google.com/android/adc.html )
>         gives a
>        >     404 which is
>        >     >     weird for a google site.
>        >     >     Is this challenge cancelled? I hope not......
>        >     >
>        >     >
>        >     >
>        >     >
>        >     >
>        >     > >
>        >
>        >
>        >     --
>        >
>        >     * Written an Android App? - List it at
>        http://andappstore.com/ *
>        >
>        >     ======
>        >     Funky Android Limited is registered in England & Wales
>        with the
>        >     company number  6741909. The registered head office is
>        Kemp House,
>        >     152-160 City Road, London,  EC1V 2NX, UK.
>        >
>        >     The views expressed in this email are those of the
>        author and not
>        >     necessarily those of Funky Android Limited, it's
>        associates, or it's
>        >     subsidiaries.
>        >
>        >
>        >
>        >
>        >
>        > >
>
>
>        --
>
>        * Written an Android App? - List it at http://andappstore.com/ *
>
>        ======
>        Funky Android Limited is registered in England & Wales with the
>        company number  6741909. The registered head office is Kemp
> House,
>        152-160 City Road, London,  EC1V 2NX, UK.
>
>        The views expressed in this email are those of the author and
> not
>        necessarily those of Funky Android Limited, it's associates,
>        or it's
>        subsidiaries.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> * Written an Android App? - List it at http://andappstore.com/ *
>
> ======
> Funky Android Limited is registered in England & Wales with the
> company number  6741909. The registered head office is Kemp House,
> 152-160 City Road, London,  EC1V 2NX, UK.
>
> The views expressed in this email are those of the author and not
> necessarily those of Funky Android Limited, it's associates, or it's
> subsidiaries.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Android Discuss" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/android-discuss?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to