If you've been watching the news recently, many people are unhappy with the Apple App Store selection process because of how random it is, and applauding the Android app market and Palm Pre web app market. I think this alone is good enough reason to stick to the way things are being done. It goes against Google's "open" policy that they are trying to push, otherwise in my opinion. If someone wants to make a "baby-shaker" app, then even though it's in bad taste, they can make it and publish it. That's all it takes, and in my opinion, that's all it should take. ------------------ http://andrewhays.net http://ashays.livejournal.com
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 5:38 PM, lbcoder <[email protected]> wrote: > > No. > The market has nothing to do with confidence. > If you don't trust the software author, don't download it. > If you buy it and don't like it, refund it. > If all the comments are negative, kinda tells you something about the > app. > Charging a fee for publishing software doesn't make that software any > better. It is also a bad idea for google since it will put their name > on the line. > > > On Aug 1, 12:32 pm, Ian <[email protected]> wrote: > > Anyone think Google should have a certification process for apps? > > Continue to allow most apps but for an extra small fee have apps given > > a seal of approval? This would give confidence in the market, > > something iPhone users enjoy and Apple uses for marketing. > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-discuss?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
