Given the amount of emails the LicMax guys have put to the list I thought it 
would be worth trying their solution and it took me all of 20 minutes from the 
moment I downloaded their demo to having it falsely report that the demo 
application was permanently authorised (I actually could get it to report 
whatever I wanted, but going from unauthorised to permanently authorised seemed 
a good demo).

I've nothing against competition, but when we're talking about a fundamental 
aspect of developers income (i.e. anti-piracy measures), I have little time for 
badly thought out solutions that aren't hard to break.

If anyone has a LicMax secure application and they'd like to confirm that what 
I've done will unlock their app then please send me the APK (off-list of 
course), and I'll make a video available showing a "before" and "after" video 
showing the normal application state and the post-break application state. I'm 
only going to do 1 app so that it can be independently verified, I'm not going 
to start showing everyone the same thing for different apps.

And no, I'm not going to make public how I did it. I'm not interested in 
helping people crack protection systems, I'm only interested in ensuring 
developers don't start using sub-standard solutions.

And yes, the method I used would work for other platforms they support.

Al.
--

* Looking for Android Apps? - Try http://andappstore.com/ *

======
Funky Android Limited is registered in England & Wales with the company number  
6741909. 

The views expressed in this email are those of the author and not necessarily 
those of Funky Android Limited, it's associates, or it's subsidiaries.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Android Discuss" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/android-discuss?hl=en.

Reply via email to