Sean,  NO WAY is rooting a human rights issue.    But hey... the source code
is available and anyone who wants to do so can compile it and then find a
device to install it on.   That's called OPEN source.  Not a human right but
a right of the license for anyone to use if they want to make the effort to
do so.    Having things handed to someone should NEVER be a human right.

Just one person's opinion

On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 9:22 PM, Disconnect <[email protected]> wrote:

> Thats funny, do you have a link for where they published these "fundamental
> tenets"?
>
> Cuz.. its funny.. out of the dozens (hundreds?) of different android
> devices released since the G1, afiak they only provided 2 that were rootable
> in any reasonable way (nexus phones)
>
> That doesn't sound like a fundamental tenet at all to me...
>
> (Also, this probably belongs on android-discuss..)
>
> On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 5:39 PM, Sean McGuffee <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> I just got an Android phone for the first time today. I noticed right
>> away that there is no option in the settings to enable root access.
>> Come on developers! It's one thing to make an option to turn off root
>> access, but it's another to remove the option to turn it back on. I
>> propose that it become a FUNDAMENTAL TENET of the the Android
>> operating system that if MUST ALWAYS ALLOW ANY USER TO ENABLE ROOT
>> ACCESS IN SETTINGS. How can it be that it has come to this? Why are
>> people and companies so afraid of letting people use their operating
>> systems. If you are one of the people associated with the concept of
>> creating an operating system configured without root access, you
>> should be ashamed of yourself. People like me shouldn't have to go and
>> re-configure or re-write an operating system to get ONE option to be
>> root. Seriously, this shouldn't be an issue and I am dead serious
>> about the entire community uniting on this tenet of always allowing
>> root access. No adult should ever be able to purchase a android phone
>> and not automatically be given a way to get access to root and set the
>> password to root. Now, I can imagine a parent wanting to use that
>> setting to disable that option, but that should be at the discretion
>> of the owner of the phone. Absolutely no company or software developer
>> should ever get the opportunity to restrict root access. As a
>> mechanism of enforcing this tenet, I propose that all future
>> distributed releases should be required to meet the requirement that
>> root access be available in settings. If a release is found to
>> restrict this or even offer a setting as is currently the case that
>> allows for the build of a phone without root access should be flagged
>> and removed from the android archives. EVERYONE WHO AGREES PLEASE
>> REPLY EXPRESSING YOUR OVERWHELMING SUPPORT!!! --No matter if you are
>> in the developer community or in the phone owner community or even
>> simply anyone who understands that this could be considered a human
>> rights issue.
>> Sincerely,
>> Sean McGuffee
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "android-platform" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> [email protected].
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/android-platform?hl=en.
>>
>>
>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Android Discuss" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/android-discuss?hl=en.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Android Discuss" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/android-discuss?hl=en.

Reply via email to