I shouldn't have said single-function; I doubt that's the reason that our downloads dropped in half right around the same time the market changes went into place. But it's possible and is a theory that still needs to be explored.
I've done a lot more looking into it and the search algorithm changes is what is driving these changes for SERs, and unfortunately, the algo takes puts more emphasis on more trivial factors than anything else. Oh well. On Jul 13, 4:05 am, Robert <[email protected]> wrote: > People prefer single function apps? It competes with web-based expense > tracking applications which have tailored pages for small screens? > It's too expensive? > > On Jul 11, 11:09 pm, "J. Maximilian" > > > > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > I've been on the market for since 2009 and since the changes that > > occurred in mid-June have dropped my downloads in half. The app is > > ProOnGo Expense and we're definitely the most full-featured expense > > tracking app out there, yet we're getting creamed by single function > > apps, that only have 4 reviews and have been on the Market for only a > > month. > > > Does anyone have any insight on this? This is really effecting > > business. There must be something I can do to change this around. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-discuss?hl=en.
