Also it's to be noted that when companies adopt opensource software in doing business, it's supposed to be a good thing; it benefits the common public if it does (there're a lot of advantages which I'm going to post in my blog).
The same thing Samsung did and got prosecuted. Samsung did not gain with opensource, they simply used an opensource infrastructure which is equally open to all other vendors, they did not get a competitive edge using Android, thus they did not gain anything using it. They gained by selling hardware which had Android preinstalled. Also, if you need an e.g. of how people believe in non-profit organization and support it, see the e.g. of Wikipedia. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Discuss" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/android-discuss/-/RbIaZdUku9AJ. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-discuss?hl=en.
