That wasn't a justification, I don't work for Google :) That I said is only the reality. As Google say. I agree with you, but the facts are these. And maybe there's a reason, or there's not. I don't know!
On Mar 28, 4:13 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I am not satisfied with your justification; even if it isn't mature > its source must be released. So that the open source community can > enhance it more. > > Ze > > On Mar 28, 4:31 am, Carlo Brualdi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > First, cross-posting is a bad practice. > > Second, Android declares to be open, but not open source; you can read > > it as open minded, for example. However probably, we hope, it will > > become fully open source when it will be more mature. Remember it's > > only an early look at SDK. > > > On Mar 28, 7:02 am, Ze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I don't understand how Android is an open source project as its source > > > hasn't been released? > > > > Ze- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Internals" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-internals?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
