I may have a similar problem here. I'm trying to run Android entirely
off the SD card (actually, microSD, on the Zoom). I made three
partitions :

- /dev/mmcblk0p1, vfat, 1G, to be mounted as /sdcard for media data
- /dev/mmcblk0p2, msdos, 10M, to host the uImage for U-Boot (i could
have put it on the first partition, but here it's hidden from the
user)
- /dev/mmcblk0p3, ext3, 1.99G, to be mounted as the entire Android
root filesystem

Using the following bootargs : 'console=ttyS2,115200n8 ip=none rw
rootwait root=/dev/mmcblk0p3 init=/init' and the following bootcmd :
'mmcinit;fatload mmc 0:2 0x81600000 uImage;bootm 0x81600000'. The
system boots and runs fine, but there's nothing mounted in /sdcard.

Did you ever got something similar ? How did you get the sdcard to be
mounted by Android when not using NFS root ? When booting from NFS
with the card already inserted, it works and /dev/block/mmcblk0p1 gets
mounted as /sdcard.

Thanks,
- Maxime

On Nov 11, 7:15 am, "Misael Lopez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > What I did for that is
> > to split the sdcard into 2 partitions: fat for user data like music,
> > videos, etc, and ext3 for the /data partition.
>
> Did you do something else apart from creating/formatting the
> partitions? I tried the
> same but Music application never accepted the card (even it the fat partition 
> is
> mounted manually/automatically), it complained about SD card not mounted.
>
> Misa
>
> 2008/11/11 Sean McNeil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
>
> > mvniekerk wrote:
> >> Well, I can help you with this much - jffs2 + Android = No Go. It will
>
> > Not true. Android runs perfectly on the Openmoko Freerunner using JFFS2
> > for root and system. You need to qualify your statement as the only real
> > partition that needs mmap is the /data partition. What I did for that is
> > to split the sdcard into 2 partitions: fat for user data like music,
> > videos, etc, and ext3 for the /data partition.
>
> >> run a few apps until the actual zygote stuff needs to run. mmap is the
> >> thing that will screw you over - you only get mmap with read only
> >> jffs2.
> >> yaffs2 + NOR = No Go. It will fall over and flop.
> >> UBIFS + NOR + Android = Works well actually. Got it running on our
> >> iMX31 board with NOR. I'll post some instructions to get UBIFS working
> >> if you need it. UBIFS = JFFS3. It has compression and a lot of other
> >> cool stuff. It also scales well.
>
> >> On Nov 10, 4:10 pm, Markus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >>> Hi,
>
> >>> yes, we might change to a different file system, but actually, Android
> >>> uses yaffs2 as main file system or at least it seems like this if you
> >>> hack into its configuration files. To be honest, we do not know, if
> >>> this problem is caused by the file system or something else as we are
> >>> able to do file operations in /data/app during the booting process.
> >>> The kernel panic occurs after Android finished the booting process. So
> >>> our guess is that Android starts something, that watches the file
> >>> system (especially /data/app) and that this service is causing our
> >>> problem. Unfortunately, we could not yet locate, which tool is
> >>> responsible... any guess, what is started in the end of the booting
> >>> process, that might cause our problem?
>
> >>> Below, a log of the kernel panic.
>
> >>> Bye
> >>> Markus
>
> >>> busybox cp ApiDemos.apk test
> >>> Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 00100104
> >>> pgd = c70a4000
> >>> [00100104] *pgd=870a2031, *pte=857180dd, *ppte=8571880e
> >>> Internal error: Oops: 81f [#1] PREEMPT
> >>> Modules linked in:
> >>> CPU: 0    Not tainted  (2.6.24-140-g68eb4b4 #77)
> >>> PC is at android_unlock_suspend+0x60/0x170
> >>> LR is at android_unlock_suspend+0x34/0x170
> >>> pc : [<c01ff8b4>]    lr : [<c01ff888>]    psr: 60000193
> >>> sp : c711bea8  ip : c039bac4  fp : c711bee4
> >>> r10: c711a000  r9 : 000001e0  r8 : 60000113
> >>> r7 : c7de20a0  r6 : c039babc  r5 : c039babc  r4 : c7de20e0
> >>> r3 : c7c35da8  r2 : 00100100  r1 : 00200200  r0 : c7de20e0
> >>> Flags: nZCv  IRQs off  FIQs on  Mode SVC_32  ISA ARM  Segment user
> >>> Control: 00e5387f  Table: 870a4000  DAC: 00000015
> >>> Process FileObserver (pid: 1675, stack limit = 0xc711a260)
> >>> Stack: (0xc711bea8 to 0xc711c000)
> >>> bea0:                   c710401c c7cfac40 c711bed4 c711bec0 c00603cc
> >>> c006035c
> >>> bec0: c73dc3c0 00000000 c73dc3d0 c7de20a0 c73dc3c0 c711a000 c711befc
> >>> c711bee8
> >>> bee0: c00c4f90 c01ff860 c73dc3c0 46a2cba4 c711bf4c c711bf00 c00c57d0
> >>> c00c4f30
> >>> bf00: c003f92c 46a2cb84 c7cfac70 00000000 c7cfac40 c005b298 c711bf18
> >>> c711bf18
> >>> bf20: c02bfa58 c7043ea0 46a2cb84 c711bf78 00000200 c0025004 c711a000
> >>> 41046fc0
> >>> bf40: c711bf74 c711bf50 c00961a4 c00c5634 c711bf74 c711bf60 c7043ea0
> >>> fffffff7
> >>> bf60: 00000000 00000000 c711bfa4 c711bf78 c00965ec c00960fc 00000000
> >>> 00000000
> >>> bf80: 001ce0b0 00000001 00000f4c ad352cd8 001cf5b8 00000003 00000000
> >>> c711bfa8
> >>> bfa0: c0024e80 c00965b4 00000f4c ad352cd8 0000001e 46a2cb84 00000200
> >>> fd1fafed
> >>> bfc0: 00000f4c ad352cd8 001cf5b8 00000003 46a2cda0 41046fd4 41046fc0
> >>> 00000001
> >>> bfe0: ad353458 46a2cb48 ad3414c9 afe0b50c 00000010 0000001e 00ff00ff
> >>> 00ff00ff
> >>> Backtrace:
> >>> [<c01ff854>] (android_unlock_suspend+0x0/0x170) from [<c00c4f90>]
> >>> (remove_kevent+0x6c/0x94)
> >>> [<c00c4f24>] (remove_kevent+0x0/0x94) from [<c00c57d0>] (inotify_read
> >>> +0x1a8/0x1e4)
> >>>  r4:46a2cba4
> >>> [<c00c5628>] (inotify_read+0x0/0x1e4) from [<c00961a4>] (vfs_read
> >>> +0xb4/0x144)
> >>> [<c00960f0>] (vfs_read+0x0/0x144) from [<c00965ec>] (sys_read
> >>> +0x44/0x70)
> >>>  r7:00000000 r6:00000000 r5:fffffff7 r4:c7043ea0
> >>> [<c00965a8>] (sys_read+0x0/0x70) from [<c0024e80>] (ret_fast_syscall
> >>> +0x0/0x2c)
> >>>  r7:00000003 r6:001cf5b8 r5:ad352cd8 r4:00000f4c
> >>> Code: e5965000 e5812000 e5843000 e59c3000 (e5821004)
> >>> Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception
>
> >>> On 9 Nov., 10:16, mvniekerk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >>>> Your answer lies in UBIFS. There is a port for kernel 2.6.24 up to
> >>>> 2.6.27. UBIFS is JFFS3 if you like - and it does support mmap. If your
> >>>> flash chip is of the NOR-type then YAFFS2 will not work - that is what
> >>>> makes UBIFS so sweet!
> >>>> To set up a UBI volume for UBIFS is bit of a schlep, but once done it
> >>>> is a cool piece of equipment.
>
> >>>> On Nov 6, 11:39 pm, Markus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >>>>> Hi,
>
> >>>>> it is the init process, that cannot start. The kernel is always
> >>>>> booting fine and only the Android init process is not able to do its
> >>>>> job. For yaffs2, the booting process stops like 
> >>>>> inhttp://groups.google.com/group/android-porting/browse_thread/thread/d...
> >>>>> - I'm sorry, that I can't post my own message at the moment, but I do
> >>>>> not have access to the hardware right now to flash everything...
>
> >>>>> Like in the link above, we get the same problem about the magic
> >>>>> number, while Android tries to load the core.jar file. After 4 tries,
> >>>>> Android resigns and reboots.
>
> >>>>> bye
> >>>>> Markus
>
> >>>>> On 6 Nov., 17:22, "Gergely Kis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >>>>>> Hi,
>
> >>>>>> Could you give more information regarding "Android was not able to
> >>>>>> boot onyaffs2". What were the actual error messages? Did the kernel
> >>>>>> hang, or the init process?
>
> >>>>>> Best Regards,
> >>>>>> Gergely
>
> >>>>>> On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 4:18 PM, Markus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >>>>>>> Hi,
>
> >>>>>>> as I wrote in Android Internals, we ported Android to an i.MX31.
> >>>>>>> Unfortunately, we have some issues with the file system.
> >>>>>>> If I use NFS as file system with a modified init.rc config, everything
> >>>>>>> seems to work well, but this is no option for us as permanent file
> >>>>>>> system, so we decided to useyaffs2as file system. As this did not
> >>>>>>> work (Android was not able to boot), we changed to jffs2. jffs2 boots
> >>>>>>> fine as long as we use a read-only file system. After booting, we can
> >>>>>>> start many applications, but it seems that those requiring file write
> >>>>>>> operations fail to start, e.g. the webbrowser. If we change init.rc
> >>>>>>> config to give file-write permissions, Android is not able to boot
> >>>>>>> anymore.
>
> >>>>>>> So we have decided to use a mixture ofyaffs2and jffs2, after we saw
> >>>>>>> this idea at the armv4 port. The basic idea is, that all mmap
> >>>>>>> operations are done onyaffs2, as jffs2 does not support them. At the
> >>>>>>> moment, we split the file system to two parts: /data is located on our
> >>>>>>> yaffs2partition, everything else on our jffs2 partition. The system
> >>>>>>> boots fine and we can run every application. But now, it is getting
> >>>>>>> confusing: As soon as Android has finished booting, it is impossible
> >>>>>>> to write/delete files in /data/app - if we do, we get a kernel panic,
> >>>>>>> which reports FileObserver to fail. This does not happen, if we do
> >>>>>>> file accesses before Android has finished its booting process.
>
> >>>>>>> Remembering that we had some cases, in which it was necessary to start
> >>>>>>> the system with strace running in the background (and discarding the
> >>>>>>> log), I booted theyaffs2/jffs2 system with strace in the background.
> >>>>>>> Now, I am able to access files in /data/app, I just get "syscall:
> >>>>>>> unknown syscall trap 0xe1a00000" reported to my debug console. In this
> >>>>>>> mode, it is also possible to run applications directly from Eclipse on
> >>>>>>> the target device.
>
> >>>>>>> So can anybody tell me what is going wrong, if I use ayaffs2only
> >>>>>>> file system? And why does strace heal those problems with ayaffs2/
> >>>>>>> jffs2 system? It just makes the system slower...
>
> >>>>>>> bye
> >>>>>>> Markus
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
website: http://groups.google.com/group/android-porting
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to