I agree, Steve. We're getting ready for another round of improvements to the camera for the next release after Cupcake.
If you have suggestions for parameters you think should be standardized, please let me know. On Mar 3, 5:37 am, steve2641 <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm not really interested in someone else's Camera HAL implementation, > I have my own. What I'm interested in is making sure I stay in sync > with the potential future list of camera parameters. For instance, > say I want to add a new feature to control flash, so in my > implementation I add a "flash-mode" parameter for this. There is no > way to know whether "flash-mode" will be a common name that all > manufacturers will use. Maybe next week the someone will release a > product using "strobe-mode" or "flash-state" or anything that is > different than what I chose. It seems that the OHA should decide on a > list of camera parameters for the common features that will be likely > added over the next year or two so that all vendors can use them when > adding these common features. If this doesn't happen then the > developers of camera related apps will have to have platform specific > code to handle the differences in the implementations camera > parameters, which really seems to go against what I perceive as one of > the big benefits of this framework, portability. > > Steve. > > On Mar 2, 9:46 pm, Prashant J Zaveri <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi Steve, > > > Qualcomm and Zoom has got its own HAL implementation for camera. You can > > check out that. Though the parameters supported are same, you will get > > better idea of how it is implemented. > > > Regards, > > Prashant Zaveri > > > On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 2:59 AM, steve2641 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > Is there, or should there be, a public list of common camera > > > parameters? So far the only way we have found out about existing > > > camera parameters is through the code in the sample camera HAL and > > > stock camera app. > > > > We have internally specified additional camera parameters for the new > > > features that we are adding, but there is a concern that our additions > > > will not be common with the additions made by Google or other > > > manufacturers. We desire to stay in common as much as possible in > > > order to allow 3rd party applications to function on our platform with > > > few if any changes, but at the moment there does not seem to be a > > > public list of future camera parameters to allow common development. > > > > Is there a plan to publically release such a list of future camera > > > parameters? > > > > Steve.- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ unsubscribe: [email protected] website: http://groups.google.com/group/android-porting -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
