HI YiSun:
After roll back and re-apply all the patches, it seemed that my
configurations are right,and compling the x86 branch now ,but there
are still other errors;
prebuilt/linux-x86/toolchain/i686-unknown-linux-gnu-4.2.1/bin/i686-
unknown-linux-gnu-gcc -m32 -o out/target/product/eee_701/obj/lib/
crtbegin_static.o -c bionic/libc/arch-x86/bionic/crtbegin_static.S
i686-unknown-linux-gnu-gcc: error trying to exec 'cc1': execvp: No
such file or directory
make: *** [out/target/product/eee_701/obj/lib/crtbegin_static.o] Error
1
make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
prebuilt/linux-x86/toolchain/i686-unknown-linux-gnu-4.2.1/bin/i686-
unknown-linux-gnu-gcc -m32 -o out/target/product/eee_701/obj/lib/
crtbegin_so.o -c bionic/libc/arch-x86/bionic/crtbegin_so.S
i686-unknown-linux-gnu-gcc: error trying to exec 'cc1': execvp: No
such file or directory
make: *** [out/target/product/eee_701/obj/lib/crtbegin_so.o] Error 1
It semed that I have no compliers for assembly code. my host pc
is ubuntu8.04, gcc version is 4.2.4.
Thanks!
On 5月27日, 下午12时19分, Yi Sun <[email protected]> wrote:
> Ya,both patches are needed.But they have common parts and you will see
> errors when you apply both patches.
> The way to solve the error is to rollback the init.rc after you apply
> the boot_able_img patch and the apply the power patch
> Sorry for the inconvenience. It is on my to be fixed list
>
> On May 26, 2009, at 8:15 PM, GrainWang <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > HI YiSun:
> > The auto apply patch method is too complicated,and with your
> > help, I succesfully apply all the patches manually except 0001-1.-
> > enabled-power-mgt.patch, is this a out-of-day patch,I have seen that
> > both this patch and boot_able_img_v2.patch try to apply patch to the
> > init.rc in asus/eee_701 file. Am i right? If not,how to use the two
> > patches to the same object? Thanks!
>
> > On 5月27日, 上午12时12分, Yi Sun <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> You try to apply the patches in the wrong directory. Look into the
> >> patch
> >> and find out where you can run the patch.
> >> Yi
>
> >> On Tue, 2009-05-26 at 00:49 -0700, GrainWang wrote:
> >>> HI YiSun:
> >>> Thanks for your great help.
> >>> When appling the patches, have the following issue. See the
> >>> message below:
>
> >>> |>From f4a2e330101cce7ee2e13a6b0a82c24f93923130 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00
> >>> 2001
> >>> |From: Yi Sun <[email protected]>
> >>> |Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 17:46:54 -0700
> >>> |Subject: [PATCH] 1. added mouse cursor
> >>> |
> >>> |---
> >>> | core/java/android/view/RawInputEvent.java | 3 +-
> >>> | include/ui/EventHub.h | 3 +-
> >>> | libs/ui/EventHub.cpp | 4 +
> >>> | .../java/com/android/server/KeyInputQueue.java | 45 +++++---
> >>> | .../com/android/server/WindowManagerService.java | 120 +++++++
> >>> ++++
> >>> +++++++--
> >>> | 5 files changed, 150 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
> >>> |
> >>> |diff --git a/core/java/android/view/RawInputEvent.java b/core/java/
> >>> android/view/RawInputEvent.java
> >>> |index 30da83e..4d9a11a 100644
> >>> |--- a/core/java/android/view/RawInputEvent.java
> >>> |+++ b/core/java/android/view/RawInputEvent.java
> >>> --------------------------
> >>> File to patch: core/java/android/view/RawInputEvent.java
> >>> core/java/android/view/RawInputEvent.java: No such file or directory
> >>> Skip this patch? [y] n
> >>> : No such file or directory
> >>> Skip this patch? [y] n
> >>> File to patch: core/java/android/view/RawInputEvent.java
> >>> core/java/android/view/RawInputEvent.java: No such file or directory
> >>> Skip this patch? [y]
>
> >>> Why I'm wrong, I created a script file "bash_patch"with the
> >>> content,
> >>> for patch in `pwd`/*patch ; do
> >>> project=`awk '/^project /{print $2}' $patch`
> >>> (cd $project && patch -p1 < $patch)
> >>> done
>
> >>> and cd /home/cupcake/framework/base
> >>> mkdir patches
> >>> cp -rf somepath/*.patch patches
> >>> cp -rf somepath/bash_path patches
> >>> ./bash_patch
>
> >>> On 5月26日, 下午2时35分, Yi Sun <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>> On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 23:22 -0700, GrainWang wrote:
> >>>>> HI YiSun:
> >>>>> Thanks for your efficent help. I have breifly tried the
> >>>>> website,and corresponding method for about 2days. Now have the
> >>>>> following issues:
> >>>>> 1. As I know,"cupcake" is a float branch,and "eee701"
> >>>>> project is
> >>>>> not included in"cupcake", and it seemed that "eee701" project is
> >>>>> rarely updated,and "cupcake" are always changing,so could they
> >>>>> match
> >>>>> now?
>
> >>>> The eee701 project only has some makefile changes to make Android
> >>>> to
> >>>> build for x86 target. There are not much of eeepc specific
> >>>> things. So,
> >>>> as long as you make your make file correct, you should be able to
> >>>> use
> >>>> most of the code from standard Android release> 2. Can I use
> >>>> "eee701" project to use with"master branch"?
>
> >>>> Yes, there is one as matter fact.> 3. I started downloading
> >>>> cupcake on 2009,05,21,finished on
> >>>>> 2009,05,25,and when checking out the eee701 project,the repo sync
> >>>>> found cupcake changed,and downloaded the changed part, when
> >>>>> building
> >>>>> using "TARGET_ARCH=x86 TARGET_PRODUCT=eee_701
> >>>>> DISABLE_DEXPREOPT=true
> >>>>> make -j4 installer_img", found that "Please rename "vendor/asus/
> >>>>> eee_701/Android.mk" to "vendor/asus/eee_701/AndroidBoard.mk",
> >>>>> and did
> >>>>> as guided, found that 'com.google.android.maps error"(I don't
> >>>>> rember
> >>>>> this error information clearly),modified the
> >>>>> "generic_with_google.mk"
> >>>>> and it passed,but the compilation process always show something
> >>>>> like
> >>>>> 'arm",and when finished,I can't find the correpoding image file.
>
> >>>> Check out/target/product directory to see if you have an eee701
> >>>> directory there. I'm updating my tree and will try it out as
> >>>> well.> 4. I'm sorry that I can't understand the apply
> >>>> patches part, I
> >>>>> checked this part,mostly bug related, so I did not aplly the
> >>>>> patches,
> >>>>> will this cause that the packages built can't be loading and
> >>>>> demo the
> >>>>> basic funcions?
>
> >>>> Yes, you have to apply all these patches. Otherwise, I don't
> >>>> think you
> >>>> can even build your tree.
>
> >>>>> Thanks again!
>
> >>>>> On 5月26日, 上午11时55分, Yi Sun <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>>> On Tue, 2009-05-26 at 11:12 +0800, zqqa zqqa wrote:
> >>>>>>> 2. Is the “asus eee701” project in "cupcake" only
> >>>>>>> fit for asus’s
> >>>>>>> net books? Or it’s fit for any x86 based net books?
>
> >>>>>>> no,it can use in any x86 platform.please visit
> >>>>>>>http://code.google.com/p/live-android.
> >>>>>>> it bases on asus eee701” project in "cupcake".
>
> >>>>>>> 2009/5/22 GrainWang <[email protected]>
>
> >>>>>>> Dear friends:
> >>>>>>> I'm a fresh guy on Android system. And have the
> >>>>>>> following
> >>>>>>> questions:
> >>>>>>> 1. Is there any stable release that fit x86 net
> >>>>>>> book? I
> >>>>>>> heard
> >>>>>>> the name “cupcake”, but it semed to be a float
> >>>>>>> branch?
>
> >>>>>> no, there is no stable release even we are trying to create
> >>>>>> one. But at
> >>>>>> the moment, I'm still looking for a server with enough space to
> >>>>>> host the
> >>>>>> source tree.> 2. Is the “asus eee701” projec
> >>>>>> t in "cupcake" only fit
> >>>>>>> for asus’s
> >>>>>>> net books? Or it’s fit for any x86 based net books?
>
> >>>>>> You should be able to boot up eee701 on most of the x86
> >>>>>> machines, but,
> >>>>>> you will need to take care of the devices on your platform to
> >>>>>> make sure
> >>>>>> they works fine.> 3. The latest stable version
> >>>>>> that fit for x86 is?
>
> >>>>>> See code.google.com/p/patch-hosting-for-android-x86-support to
> >>>>>> understand how to build a x86 enabled android.>
> >>>>>> 4. The OpenCore's version in "cupcake" now is very old,
> >>>>>>> in
> >>>>>>> "android-sdk-1.5r1" which is also a stable release, the
> >>>>>>> OpenCore's
> >>>>>>> version is much newer(V2.02), so I doubt that if there
> >>>>>>> is
> >>>>>>> possibilty
> >>>>>>> that I put the eee701 project into "android-sdk-1.5r1"
> >>>>>>> and
> >>>>>>> without
> >>>>>>> mofication it'll work on x86 net books, or should I port
> >>>>>>> V2.02's
> >>>>>>> version into "cupcake" branch,I completely have no
> >>>>>>> idea which
> >>>>>>> way is
> >>>>>>> better, as I have little knowledge in eee701 project,
> >>>>>>> and does
> >>>>>>> not
> >>>>>>> know what this project acturally do and how to do.
>
> >>>>>> YOu should be able to build opencore for x86. See
> >>>>>> code.google.com/p/patch-hosting-for-android-x86-support to
> >>>>>> understand
> >>>>>> how to build a x86 enabled android.
>
> >>>>>>> 5. Is any version that fit for x86 and contain
> >>>>>>> OpenCore’s newer
> >>>>>>> versions (V2.01 or V2.02)?
> >>>>>>> 6. Is there any doc exist for port "android-
> >>>>>>> sdk-1.5r1"
> >>>>>>> into x86?
>
> >>>>>> You don't need to worry about SDK for the moment. What you need
> >>>>>> to do is
> >>>>>> to
> >>>>>> 1. check out cupcake,
> >>>>>> 2. check out eee701 project
> >>>>>> 3. apply all the patches listed in
> >>>>>> code.google.com/p/patch-hosting-for-android-x86-support
> >>>>>> 4. rebuild android
>
> >>>>>> If you have problem to build your tree for x86 with the patches
> >>>>>> you get
> >>>>>> from code.google.com/p/patch-hosting-for-android-x86-support,
> >>>>>> you can
> >>>>>> send e-mail to this list for answers.
>
> >>>>>>> Thanks in advance!- 隐藏被引用文字 -
>
> >>>>>> - 显示引用的文字 -- 隐藏被引用文字 -
>
> >>>>>> - 显示引用的文字 -- 隐藏被引用文字 -
>
> >>>> - 显示引用的文字 -- 隐藏被引用文字 -
>
> >> - 显示引用的文字 -- 隐藏被引用文字 -
>
> - 显示引用的文字 -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
unsubscribe: [email protected]
website: http://groups.google.com/group/android-porting
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
