Hi John..

Im trying to build OpenCORE outside of Android(Ubuntu-9.04)

I followed the instructions given in quich_start.txt.. I want to knwo
some details regarding this.

1) Is thr any memory constraints related to this build?
2) How much time it will take to build ?

Because after giving "make -j" command after some time my system is
got hanged..

i think build process is going on internally, i dont think so??
U have good idea on this if im not wrong because u already did it
right??
Pls help me if im going wrong...

any help would greatly appreciated.

On Nov 12, 1:56 pm, John Lee <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Ravi,
>
> The same problem happens in several places. I also have to fix
>
> H223LogicalChannel::~H223LogicalChannel()
> PVCommsIONodePort::~PVCommsIONodePort()
>
> I have tried a similar method to fix this before, but
> pv2way_omx_engine_test will hang after some more tests, and I'm not
> sure if it's related. Will start tracing that. Here is the results
> after I set iPortActivityHandler to NULL in all 3 places:
>
> [output]
>
> Start avtest, proxy 1,Audio SrcFormat:X-AMR-IF2 Audio SinkFormat:X-AMR-IF2 
> Video SourceFormat:X-YUV-420 Video SinkFormat:video/MP4V-ES
> Indication with logical channel #6 Audio outgoing Track
> Indication with logical channel #7 Video outgoing Track
> Indication with logical channel #65542 Audio incoming Track
> Indication with logical channel #65543 Video incoming Track
> Start avtest, proxy 1,Audio SrcFormat:X-AMR-IF2 Audio SinkFormat:X-AMR-IF2 
> Video SourceFormat:video/MP4V-ES Video SinkFormat:X-YUV-420
> Indication with logical channel #6 Audio outgoing Track
> Indication with logical channel #7 Video outgoing Track
> Indication with logical channel #65542 Audio incoming Track
>
> [hang, ctrl-c, backtrace]
>
> (gdb) bt
> #0  0xf7fdf430 in __kernel_vsyscall ()
> #1  0xf76501f5 in pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.3.2 () from 
> /lib32/libpthread.so.0
> #2  0xf7b6637b in OsclSemaphore::Wait (this=0x807c278)
>     at 
> /home/john/scm/mydroid/external/opencore/oscl/oscl/osclproc/src/oscl_semaphore.cpp:116
> #3  0xf7b647e6 in OsclReadyQ::WaitAndPopTop (this=0x807c218)
>     at 
> /home/john/scm/mydroid/external/opencore/oscl/oscl/osclproc/src/oscl_scheduler_readyq.cpp:123
> #4  0xf7b60f99 in OsclExecSchedulerCommonBase::WaitForReadyAO (this=0x807c168)
>     at 
> /home/john/scm/mydroid/external/opencore/oscl/oscl/osclproc/src/oscl_scheduler.cpp:1380
> #5  0xf7b60d97 in OsclExecSchedulerCommonBase::BlockingLoopL (this=0x807c168)
>     at 
> /home/john/scm/mydroid/external/opencore/oscl/oscl/osclproc/src/oscl_scheduler.cpp:1290
> #6  0xf7b5fcfe in OsclExecSchedulerCommonBase::StartScheduler 
> (this=0x807c168, aSignal=0x0)
>     at 
> /home/john/scm/mydroid/external/opencore/oscl/oscl/osclproc/src/oscl_scheduler.cpp:797
> #7  0x0805dc9f in av_test::test (this=0x819a1e0)
>     at 
> /home/john/scm/mydroid/external/opencore/engines/2way/test/src/av_test.cpp:51
> #8  0x08062a47 in test_case::run_test (this=0x819a1e0)
>     at 
> /home/john/scm/mydroid/external/opencore/oscl/unit_test/src/test_case.cpp:57
> #9  0x080629c6 in test_case::run_subtests (this=0xffffcaf4)
>     at 
> /home/john/scm/mydroid/external/opencore/oscl/unit_test/src/test_case.cpp:44
> #10 0x08062a35 in test_case::run_test (this=0xffffcaf4)
>     at 
> /home/john/scm/mydroid/external/opencore/oscl/unit_test/src/test_case.cpp:55
> #11 0x080556da in start_test () at 
> /home/john/scm/mydroid/external/opencore/engines/2way/test/src/test_engine.cpp:852
> #12 0x08055602 in test_wrapper () at 
> /home/john/scm/mydroid/external/opencore/engines/2way/test/src/test_engine.cpp:761
> #13 0x08055659 in local_main (filehandle=0xf761b4c0, command_line=0xffffcc10)
>     at 
> /home/john/scm/mydroid/external/opencore/engines/2way/test/src/test_engine.cpp:790
> #14 0x08064bd0 in main (argc=1, argv=0xffffccf4)
>     at 
> /home/john/scm/mydroid/external/opencore/oscl/unit_test/src/unit_test_main.cpp:70
>
> Regards,
> John
>
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 06:52:09AM -0800, RaviY wrote:
> > We found a similar problem. Please try to set "iPortActivityHandler to
> > NULL" in the destructor of "H223LowerLayer".
>
> > -Ravi
>
> > On Nov 11, 8:12�am, John Lee <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > Hi list,
>
> > > I've been trying to compile and run opencore on native PC following
> > > the instructions in quick_start.txt . The reason I want to do this is
> > > that it's supposed to be easier to work on host pc since what I want
> > > to do is not hardware dependent, but so far it doesn't seem to be the
> > > case. After 8 bug fix commits I managed to finish the compilation, but
> > > other problem follows. �Here is the problem description:
>
> > > Since H223LowerLayer is both PvmfPortBaseImpl and
> > > PVMFPortActivityHandler, it sends itself to the constructor of
> > > PvmfPortBaseImpl to act as its iPortActivityHandler. During the
> > > destruction of PvmfPortBaseImpl,
> > > iPortActivityHandler->HandlePortActivity will be called. �The problem
> > > is, the real implementation of HandlePortActivity lies inside
> > > H223LowerLayer, and the order of destruction is:
>
> > > ~H223LowerLayer
> > > ~PvmfPortBaseImpl
> > > � iPortActivityHandler->HandlePortActivity
>
> > > So when HandlePortActivity is actually invoked,
> > > H223LowerLayer::HandlePortActivity() is already invalid, and the code
> > > path falls to PVMFPortActivityHandler::HandlePortActivity, which is a
> > > pure virtual function. This will cause a SIGABRT:
>
> > > pure virtual method called
> > > terminate called without an active exception
>
> > > Program received signal SIGABRT, Aborted.
>
> > > (Backtrace enclosed.)
>
> > > p.s. Here is the snipped source code related to this issue:
>
> > > external/opencore/protocols/systems/3g-324m_pvterminal/h223/include/lowerlayer.h:
> > > class H223LowerLayer : public PvmfPortBaseImpl,
> > > � � � � public PVMFPortActivityHandler
>
> > > };
>
> > > external/opencore/pvmi/pvmf/include/pvmf_port_base_impl.h:
> > > class PvmfPortBaseImpl : public PVMFPortInterface
> > > {
> > > � � � � OSCL_IMPORT_REF PvmfPortBaseImpl(int32 aPortTag, 
> > > PVMFPortActivityHandler* aNode, const char*name = NULL);
>
> > > };
>
> > > external/opencore/pvmi/pvmf/include/pvmf_port_interface.h:
> > > class PVMFPortInterface
> > > {
> > > � � � � PVMFPortActivityHandler *iPortActivityHandler;
>
> > > };
>
> > > external/opencore/pvmi/pvmf/include/pvmf_node_interface.h:
> > > class PVMFPortActivityHandler
> > > {
> > > � � public:
> > > � � � � virtual ~PVMFPortActivityHandler() {}
> > > � � � � virtual void HandlePortActivity(const PVMFPortActivity &) 
> > > = 0;
>
> > > };
>
> > > implementation:
>
> > > external/opencore/protocols/systems/3g-324m_pvterminal/h223/src/lowerlayer.cpp:
> > > H223LowerLayer::H223LowerLayer(int32 aPortTag, TPVLoopbackMode 
> > > aLoopbackMode)
> > > � � � � : � PvmfPortBaseImpl(aPortTag, this),
> > > {
>
> > > }
>
> > > external/opencore/pvmi/pvmf/src/pvmf_port_base_impl.cpp:
> > > OSCL_EXPORT_REF PvmfPortBaseImpl::PvmfPortBaseImpl(int32 aTag, 
> > > PVMFPortActivityHandler* aNode, const char*name)
> > > � � � � : PVMFPortInterface(aNode),
> > > {
>
> > > }
>
> > > OSCL_EXPORT_REF PvmfPortBaseImpl::~PvmfPortBaseImpl()
> > > {
> > > � � PortActivity(PVMF_PORT_ACTIVITY_DELETED);
>
> > > }
>
> > > OSCL_EXPORT_REF void PvmfPortBaseImpl::PortActivity(PVMFPortActivityType 
> > > aActivity)
> > > {
> > > � � if (iPortActivityHandler)
> > > � � {
> > > � � � � PVMFPortActivity activity(this, aActivity);
> > > � � � � iPortActivityHandler->HandlePortActivity(activity);
> > > � � }
>
> > > }
>
> > > �bt.txt
> > > 4KViewDownload
>
> > --
> > unsubscribe: [email protected]
> > website:http://groups.google.com/group/android-porting

-- 
unsubscribe: [email protected]
website: http://groups.google.com/group/android-porting

Reply via email to