Thanks. I'm looking at probably 6-8 months at least to ship, so eclair it is!
On Nov 15, 2009, at 6:26 PM, Jean-Baptiste Queru wrote: > It really depends on the timeframe you have in mind, or what you want > your device to do. If you want a codeline that is considered shippable > today, or if 1.6 is enough for you, go with donut (actually, > android-1.6_r1.4). If 2.0 added some features that you want, and if > you can deal with that fact that eclair will receive a few more > changes (I've seen a few more tweaks go by on our internal server > since I prepared the snapshot that I open-sourced recently), go with > eclair. > > JBQ > > On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 2:33 PM, Adam Crosby <[email protected]> > wrote: >> Hello, >> I'm trying to port android to a custom embedded (x86-based) system. >> What would be the best practice at this point - going with the >> partial >> eclair (the 'missing' stuff appears to be manufacturer related, which >> is not applicable to our device?), or the donut release? For those >> of >> us not running on HTC hardware and phones from major vendors (we have >> GSM connectivity, but are not a 'phone'), is there a guide or >> document >> for things to look out for and stuff to do? Of the current-seeming >> or >> latest documentation, it seems as if everything is focused on one or >> two phones as hardware platforms... >> >> Thanks, >> >> -- >> Adam >> >> -- >> unsubscribe: [email protected] >> website: http://groups.google.com/group/android-porting >> > > > > -- > Jean-Baptiste M. "JBQ" Queru > Software Engineer, Android Open-Source Project, Google. > > Questions sent directly to me that have no reason for being private > will likely get ignored or forwarded to a public forum with no further > warning. > > -- > unsubscribe: [email protected] > website: http://groups.google.com/group/android-porting -- unsubscribe: [email protected] website: http://groups.google.com/group/android-porting
