Dear Ravi:
Thank you very much. I would ask the help from legal
expert.
if we have to pay the money for the right to use the
packetvideo codecs,
i think it is ok. because i just find the solution, the
rest is decided by boss.
Best regards,
Akio
On 11月18日, 上午12時45分, RaviY <[email protected]> wrote:
> NOTE: I am not a lawyer.
>
> PacketVideo has released the codecs under Apache 2.0 license. For your
> immediate reference, the Apache 2.0 license can be found
> athttp://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html. From what I
> understand of the license, you are free to use the code at your will.
> That being said, what can or cannot go on your commercial product
> would be best known to you and/or your legal personnel.
>
> -Ravi
>
> On Nov 17, 9:55 am, Akio <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Dear Sir:
>
> > if I try to use packet video codecs in commercial projects,
> > not android based sw framework, is it ok?
> > I know i have to pay the paten holder. do I have to pay to
> > packetvideo corp?
> > BTW, I also do some modification of packet video codecs to fit
> > the xgcc enviroment and our sw stack.
> > What shoud I do? I can open the whole porject if it has to
> > follow the apache 2.0's way. If some need
> > the building system, I can provide the whole Makefile.
>
> > Thank you very much.
>
> > Best Regards,
> > Akio
--
unsubscribe: [email protected]
website: http://groups.google.com/group/android-porting
