Did they also start using Java 1.6 or newer for the build as well by any chance? I already knew about the 64-bit environment change and thus have been building my Eclair version under that..
Regards -- Ashwin On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 3:35 AM, G2 <[email protected]> wrote: > At least, it's successfully compiling on a 64-bit machine. Good work > Google! > > Hopefully, there will be less pain for a full upgrade compared to > eclair->froyo as the jump doesn't seem to be as high on the backend > side... > > Grégoire > > > On Dec 19, 8:38 pm, G2 <[email protected]> wrote: >> And no need to try to bypass the rule! You really need a 64-bit >> machine, >> >> Grégoire >> >> On Dec 19, 8:37 pm, G2 <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > =========================================== >> > PLATFORM_VERSION_CODENAME=REL >> > PLATFORM_VERSION=2.3.1 >> > TARGET_PRODUCT=generic >> > TARGET_BUILD_VARIANT=eng >> > TARGET_SIMULATOR= >> > TARGET_BUILD_TYPE=release >> > TARGET_BUILD_APPS= >> > TARGET_ARCH=arm >> > HOST_ARCH=x86 >> > HOST_OS=linux >> > HOST_BUILD_TYPE=release >> > BUILD_ID=GINGERBREAD >> > ============================================ >> > Checking build tools versions... >> > build/core/main.mk:76: >> > ************************************************************ >> > build/core/main.mk:77: You are attempting to build on a 32-bit system. >> > build/core/main.mk:78: Only 64-bit build environments are supported >> > beyond froyo/2.2. >> > build/core/main.mk:79: >> > ************************************************************ >> > build/core/main.mk:80: *** stop. Stop. >> >> > Does Google have a partnership with Intel to force everybody to >> > upgrade their machine? ;-) :-( >> >> > Grégoire >> >> > > -- > unsubscribe: [email protected] > website: http://groups.google.com/group/android-porting > -- unsubscribe: [email protected] website: http://groups.google.com/group/android-porting
