Actually, hardware cryptography devices consume much less power than software therefore it will help preserve battery life when doing intensive cryptography operations such as DRM playback. Also battery life when using WiFi may also be improved. Both of these are obvious benefits, as well as this the HW could be used for securely managing keys.
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 9:34 AM, Anders Rundgren <[email protected]> wrote: > > To begin with we may need to figure out *why* a phone vendor > would add a crypto accelerator to their phones. Personally I do > not see that happen because there's no obvious need for it. > > What phone vendors actually do work with is rather hardware-based > key storage. Nokia have had such facilities for years but have > been unable to expose it to end-users due to lack of support > infrastructure. Android "cupcake" does (AFAICT) still not support > TLS-client-certificate authentication which makes HW-protected keys > a no-issue. > > /anders > > Chris Palmer wrote: >> >> In the archives, OK asks about hardware crypto accelerators. I'm sure >> that as soon as someone makes a phone that has one built-in, they'll >> provide a driver, too. That's what device manufacturers have been >> doing so far. OpenSSL, at least, has stubs for calling out to such >> drivers, but I don't know about all the other crypto >> libraries/implementations in Android. >> >> >> On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 4:50 AM, [email protected] >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> I think i just saw some tumbleweed. >>> >>> On May 12, 8:02 pm, OK <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> As the subject implies, why the silence? >>>> Could not get any response to the questions that I posed >> > > >
