Any such mechanism must include the ability for a developer to say that a permission their app is requesting is mandatory and can't be disabled.
JBQ On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 9:23 AM, Chris Stratton <[email protected]> wrote: > Indeed. Giving users a line-item veto of 3rd party application > permissions is mandatory in today's world. > > On Jan 25, 2:18 pm, Chris Palmer <[email protected]> wrote: >> http://zachholman.com/2011/01/oauth_will_murder_your_children/ >> >> The same problem applies to Android. And, I have come around to >> thinking, so does the solution. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Android Security Discussions" group. > To post to this group, send email to > [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/android-security-discuss?hl=en. > > -- Jean-Baptiste M. "JBQ" Queru Software Engineer, Android Open-Source Project, Google. Questions sent directly to me that have no reason for being private will likely get ignored or forwarded to a public forum with no further warning. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Security Discussions" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-security-discuss?hl=en.
