Hi Tony, could you send me Matthias' B. new design of the decorator?
>Tony Mowers (another bright member of the team!) might argue again that >this is already possible today. He's right. The dynamic proxies he wrote >are quite smart. However, I'd like to re-implement them using the >decorator pattern because it is easier to understand than dynamic >proxies. I'd also like to have these decorators inside cartridges, not >inside the AndroMDA core. > >Juergen, Matthias: I've got only one problem: I'm leaving for vacation >at the end of the week and cannot do anything until the end of June. >Have you got some spare time and would like to join in? > >If so, I'd sketch my design in a separate email and let you do it, with >Tony as a coach for you two. Is this an option? Is it Matthias B. plan to re-design and re-implement the meta-classes and make heavily use of them in the templates? From my point of view it is very smart. Another argument is, when changing from UML 1.4 to UML 2.0. We only have to test the meta-classes and the templates should work. Is it right? J�rgen Dufner ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: eBay Get office equipment for less on eBay! http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/711-11697-6916-5 _______________________________________________ Andromda-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/andromda-devel
