Hi Wouter, thanks for the status - now, the email came through without problems.
I re-read your email message of September 21 and found all our discussion items in there. You are right: We disagreed only about the generation of JSPs from view classes and about the methods in the view classes that represent the button events fired by the JSPs. But I'd like to follow your suggestion of September 21 where you say: > Btw, currently I have improved the cartridge already considerably, > I have taken your input into account and this has lead to some > other significant changes. I will not go into that yet, as > I will write a nice document to describe them all. > ... snip ... > I propose this: I will continue to work as it is now, I will finish > it and put a first beta in CVS, give everybody the time to try it out > and give some feedback. Given all that input we can then compile a > new strategy for this cartridge if needed. Is this okay ? I found this very reasonable. Discussing an intermediate result is always easier and more effective than discussing a possible future result. :-) So, I'd like to wait for your first beta to appear in CVS HEAD, along with the document and sample model that you mentioned below. Then, I'll have another (closer) look at it and give you feedback. Makes me curious what's coming up... ;-) Cheers... Matthias > -----Original Message----- > From: Wouter Zoons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, October 10, 2003 7:56 PM > To: Matthias Bohlen; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: bpm4struts > > > > Hi Matthias and others, > > first of all, do not reply to this email, instead use > [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED], thanks > > > Matthias, I have already replied to your email but it seems > it did not > come through properly (probably due to the Netscape MailServer), > > I wrote that the 17th of October would be fine, but I was > waiting for a > reply on an email I sent earlier (2003-09-21 10:02), there is > a link to > it here: > http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=3164690&forum_id= 27221 <previous%20email> this email basically says I have moved to your perspective of the cartridge (guards, triggers, etc...) except for the JSP pages, my arguments are in this email. I am now writing the documentation and constructing a good example UML model to show the model constraints. The current state of the cartridge will not work with the model you've sent me, in fact IMHO I think it will be easier, quicker and more intuitive for users to model as I have chosen to do (no offence :) because I mostly rely on the graphs to do all the generation, I only use classes in the model to really model classes, not JSP pages. JSPs are generated from ActionStates, if you want a state without a JSP page you would use an ObjectFlowState, I will explain everything in my document and a sample model will make it clear. let me know if there is anything... cheers. =========================== /Hi Wouter, how is the status of the bpm4struts cartridge? The new version of the car rental system sample model that I sent you, does it generate, compile and deploy with bpm4struts? If so, we could go out with this cartridge into 3.x alpha. Curious... Matthias/ ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php _______________________________________________ Andromda-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/andromda-devel
