* Matthias Bohlen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-10-26 01:21]: > I'll comment the rest of your mail in detail, later...
OK, I'm looking forward to it. Till then, I've posted the code as a patch at [1]. It is against version 2.0.3., but I had taken some recent changes from CVS, which I have summarized in [2]. So if you want test my changes, you'll first have to apply the second patch, then mine. The dummy cartridge I mentioned is available at [3]. Finally, two sample models for testing: [4] (one static and one dynamic pair of models). [1] http://www.inf.bme.hu/~eti/andromda-history.patch.gz [2] http://www.inf.bme.hu/~eti/andromda-cvs.patch.gz [3] http://www.inf.bme.hu/~eti/andromda-dummy-incremental.zip [4] http://www.inf.bme.hu/~eti/history-sample.tar.gz If you try it, and everything goes well, you should see something like: new value for association: A_incoming_target element: org.omg.uml.behavioralelements.activitygraphs.ActionState$Impl value: trans_6 which means that one state of the activity model has got a new incoming transition, whose name is trans_6. The cartridge has access to the association and its two ends: the state and the transition. Is this amount of information enough for cartridges, or do they need something more? Of course the above is just an example, the test models contain more elements. Attila ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ _______________________________________________ Andromda-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/andromda-devel
