[EMAIL PROTECTED] grava: >Matthias, > >one of the changes I was thinking about for bpm4struts is to have the >tagged values on the UML classes instead of the state vertices, so the >classes would references the state vertices and not vice versa, IMO this >is cleaner since the dynamic model will then be more loosely coupled >from the static model, the static model is closer to the actual >implementation anyway (classnames, methods, etc...) so I have the >feeling it to be more natural this way > >what do you think ?
One comment: this ways looks better to me because we could link different classes (forms) to the same activities, easing the construction of repetitive tasks, like CRUD, changing just the forms... --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Walter Itamar Mour�o - Diretor de Tecnologia e Projetos - Arcadian S/A www.arcadian.com.br ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ _______________________________________________ Andromda-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/andromda-devel
