true, you don't need to do that anymore because we already tag the use-case containing the activity graph with the <<FrontEndUseCase>> stereotype, so it is implied we want to process these action states ... but most importantly, we now use 'View' classes to model the JSPs (before we used those action states you referred to)

so in short: we have the 'view' classes that map onto the action states (see the tagged value pointing to an action state)
we thus process the view classes only


is it clear enough ? or did I misunderstand you ?

Wouter.

Walter Mour�o wrote:

Hi Wouter,

I saw the new example and realized we don't need to add stereotypes to the
action states. Is it a good change ? I'm not sure, but it better If we
could tell the cartridge the actions states to generate forms, methods
or... documentation.

Comments ?

cheers,

Walter






-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration
See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA.
http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn
_______________________________________________
Andromda-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/andromda-devel

Reply via email to