That's what I was trying yesterday...and yes it increased performance a lot...you saw it yourself....but I reverted back because the way I was caching it was flawed, there may be cases where the same metaobject will have a different metafacade wrapping it. What ideas do you have about caching it...what could we use as a key, etc?
--- Wouter Zoons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Guys, > > I was wondering, ... each time we do > .shieldedElement(...) a new fa�ade > is created, isn�t it better to always reuse the > first one ?.. for > validation routines this is critical not to end up > into an endless loop > > If you agree I will implement the fix in the > metafacade factory, this > should also improve performance > > Thanks for letting me know > > Wouter. > ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click _______________________________________________ Andromda-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/andromda-devel
