Thanks a lot, if you say its stable and a good idea to start with, then I will just go for 3.0.

I already downloaded it yesterday and found the hibernate sample project missing =) Its all very differently set up - and I was just starting to understand how 2.x was working *sigh*. Anyway, thanks. Gonna read my way through the docs later =)

Greetings
Daniel


Lofi Dewanto wrote:

Hi Daniel,

IMO, it is not worth it to begin with 2.x, especially:
- if you are in the beginning...
- if you want to build your own cartridges...

I think AndroMDA team can reasure this ;-)

Go for the 3.x:
- it is already very usable, stable. I'm in the
process of migrating my 2.x cartridges and I'm very
happy with it.
- there are a lot of changes in the concept of
the cartridges, so it's really *not* worth it to begin
with your own 2.x cartridges...
- if you don't want to build AndroMDA 3.x by yourself,
you can download the snapshot version of AndromMDA 3.x
from:
http://team.andromda.org/maven/andromda/distributions/

Be sure to read the docu, which is IMO already almost
complete:
http://team.andromda.org
http://www.andromda.org/docs

Also check the archive in the mailinglist for the differences
between 2.x and 3.x (Wouter has answered my questions in
this topic very nicely ;-))

My 0,2 cents.

Cheers,




-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training.
Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 - digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches, unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com
_______________________________________________
Andromda-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/andromda-user

Reply via email to