You guys are amazing, must be the crystal spheres you have :<}
On Wed, 2004-11-10 at 14:54, Chad Brandon wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Wouter Zoons" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "'Christian Seiler'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2004 7:11 AM > Subject: RE: [Andromda-user] BPM4Struts Questions: Redirect After Post, > Platform Independance > > > >> 1. Is there a way to model an action as redirect? The reason for this > >> is obvious and once again discussed widely at TSS > >> http://www.theserverside.com/news/thread.tss?thread_id=29758 > > > > [WZ> ] no, but I guess we could add a tagged value for that > > Actually I did add a tagged value for this the day before yesterday. > > > > > > >> 2. It seems to me (though still an Andromd newbie) that many of the > >> @andromda.struts.* tagged values are not related directly to > >> Struts and could be shared with cartridges, which generate code > >> for other web frameworks (at least those of them which do not > >> mask the request/response scheme of the web). So they could have > >> a more generic name and make the model a little bit more independant > >> from Struts. > > > > [WZ> ] no they are definitely struts related, and they are named that way > > on > > purpose, it's not a good idea to over-generalize and over-abstract, in the > > long run you'll run into troubles (look at EJB-QL) > > > > Other framework-cartridges such as Tapestry and WebWork will have to > > define > > their own set of tagged values and you will simply have to model them > > twice > > > > You have to know that tagged values are not really considered part of the > > UML model, they are annotations to overwrite defaults. Code generation > > should always be possible without a single tagged value (except in those > > cases where a tagged value is used to by-pass a shortcoming of the UML > > tool > > you're using) > > > > Bottom line, it's too hard to decide whether or not a tagged value is > > platform-specific or not .. because suppose now we have 3 frameworks with > > feature X, if tomorrow we have framework #4 that does not support that > > feature, what ar eyou gonna do with that 'generic' tagged value ? > > > > Ideas ? > > -- Wouter > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: > > Sybase ASE Linux Express Edition - download now for FREE > > LinuxWorld Reader's Choice Award Winner for best database on Linux. > > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5588&alloc_id=12065&op=click > > _______________________________________________ > > Andromda-user mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/andromda-user > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: > Sybase ASE Linux Express Edition - download now for FREE > LinuxWorld Reader's Choice Award Winner for best database on Linux. > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5588&alloc_id=12065&op=click > _______________________________________________ > Andromda-user mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/andromda-user -- Martin West Head of Product Design and Development http://www.star-map.net +44(0)207 318 0308 +44(0)787 968 0096
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
