I'll admit that I am new to OCL, which is why I started looking for more documentation yesterday to try to fix my OCL problems with MD and AndroMDA.
Isn't the 'source' for OCL the Object Management Group? Or is the consulting firm at Klasse.nl the source of the full OCL specification? I was only familiar with OCL being used with UML, which has been there for a number of years already. Thanks to Chad, I have the correct final version of the OCL 2.0 spec which I am reading over now as it is quite different from the previous adopted version of the specs in August 2003. On Tuesday 08 March 2005 11:04 am, Wouter Zoons wrote: > > [DRA] The OCL 2.0 spec does not have "body" as a keyword. Just things > > like > > def,pre,post,let,... The section on defining operations never refers to > > "body". What spec are you using? I am looking at one from August, 2003 > > from > > OMG. > > I understand OCL is a part of UML2, .. but we always followed the specs > from the 'source', which can be found here: http://www.klasse.nl/ > > get the OCL 2 spec v1.6; paragraph 2.3.6 explains the body keyword > > http://www.klasse.nl/ocl/ocl-specification-v1-6.zip > > -- Wouter -- David Allen [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ Andromda-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/andromda-user
