can you try using just the name of the activity graph without any package
prefix to it ?
>
> Hi Wouter, hi everyone
>
> unfortunatly I still have problems with bmp4struts and ARIS UML Designer.
>
> Here is what I did:
>
> This morning I checked out andromda-all from sourceforge and build it,
> then
> I created a brand new Ant-Project using the Ant-Tool, then I started the
> generation for my model I got the following validation errors:
>
> ...
> [andromda] INFO [AndroMDA] A n d r o M D A - 3.0-RC1-20050323082126
> ...
> [andromda] ERROR [AndroMDA:VALIDATION:ERROR] 1)
> [Bpm4Struts::andropalace::presentation::tickets::TicketreservationGraph]:An
> activity graph must have a controller class context to which (optionally)
> operations can be deferred. Make sure this graph's use-ca
> se has the <<FrontEndUseCase>> stereotype.
> [andromda] ERROR [AndroMDA:VALIDATION:ERROR] 2)
> [Bpm4Struts::andropalace::presentation::tickets::TicketreservationGraph::enter
>
> criteria]:Each name of a JSP action state must be unique in the namespace
> of a use-case.
> [andromda] ERROR [AndroMDA:VALIDATION:ERROR] 3)
> [Bpm4Struts::andropalace::presentation::tickets::TicketreservationGraph::select
>
> show]:Each name of a JSP action state must be unique in the namespace of a
> use-case.
> [andromda] ERROR [AndroMDA:VALIDATION:ERROR] 4)
> [Bpm4Struts::andropalace::presentation::tickets::Ticketreservation]:Each
> use-case needs one and only one activity graph.
> [andromda] INFO [AndroMDA] completed model processing --> TIME:
> 22.052[s], RESOURCES WRITTEN: 55 - 4 VALIDATION ERROR(S)
>
> I double checked the model, escpecially the context for the ActivityGraph:
>
> ...
> <UML:ActivityGraph name="TicketreservationGraph" xmi.id
> ="ID.il----4-----p--" xmi.uuid="ID.cedaed90-995e-11d9-1068-00e000f95533"
> isSpecification="false" namespace="ID.dz----4-----p--" context
> ="ID.gf----4-----p--">
> ...
>
> where ID.gf----4-----p-- is the xmi.id of the controller class
> ("TicketreservationController"). As soon as I move the ActivityGraph
> ("TicketreservationGraph") in the namespace of my use case, no validation
> errors come up.
>
> Probably my string reference of the graph in the use case tagged value is
> wrong? How do I have to specifiy the activity graph? My Namespace
> structure
> is "Bpm4Struts::andropalace::presentation::tickets", and the value of the
> tag is "andropalace.presentation.tickets.TicketreservationGraph":
>
> <UML:UseCase name="Ticketreservation" xmi.id="ID.9-----6-----p--" xmi.uuid
> ="ID.e59a3a81-9b71-11d9-1068-00e000f95533" isSpecification="false"
> namespace="ID.dz----4-----p--" stereotype="ID.ls----4-----p--
> ID.c2----4-----p--" isRoot="false" isLeaf="false" isAbstract="false">
> <UML:ModelElement.taggedValue>
> <UML:TaggedValue xmi.id="ID.10----6-----p--" xmi.uuid
> ="ID.fd0f7a40-9b71-11d9-1068-00e000f95533" type="ID.2o----5-----p--">
>
> <UML:TaggedValue.dataValue>andropalace.presentation.tickets.TicketreservationGraph</UML:TaggedValue.dataValue>
> </UML:TaggedValue>
> </UML:ModelElement.taggedValue>
> </UML:UseCase>
>
> where ID.2o----5-----p-- is the xmi.id of the tagged definition "
> @andromda.struts.usecase.activity". Isn't that correct?
>
> Any hints would be very helpful.
>
> Regards
> Stefan
>
> P.S.: At first I tried the binary distribution of the current nightly
> build, but that seems to be an "older" build. It says
> ...
> [andromda] INFO [AndroMDA] A n d r o M D A - 3.0-RC1-20050321223404
> ...
> Are there still problems with the nightly build?
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Hello Stefan,
>
> Hmm, I've seen this error being posted before .. I will take a look at it
> this evening (I'm working now) and make sure it's fixed in case it's
> indeed
> a bug.
>
> Can you file an issue in JIRA just in case ?
>
> I thought I had a test for this, I will have to verify that. If it's a
> real
> bug it will be fixed this evening.
>
> -- Wouter
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:andromda-user-
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> consulting.de
>> Sent: Monday, March 21, 2005 3:47 PM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: [Andromda-user] Using BPM4Struts with ARIS UML Designer
>>
>> Hi everybody,
>>
>> I have a quite urgent problem with AndroMDA BPM4Struts and would be very
>> thankful for any hints. Here's the problem:
>>
>> I would like to use ARIS UML Designer together with AndroMDA BPM4Struts
>> cartridge. But ARIS UML Desginer doesn't allow to model activity graphs
> in
>> the namespace of a use case. (ARIS UML Desginer is quite rigorous in
>> it's
>> compliance to the UML spec with say that the namespace of a usecase must
>> be
>> empty, see chapter 2.11.3.5, Well-Formedness Rules for usecases, of UML
>> Spec 1.4.1 and 1.5; see also
>> http://www.mail-archive.com/andromda-
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg01318.html)
>>
>> Fortunatly the bpm4struts cartridge provides a tagged definition
>> @andromda.struts.usecases.activity for the stereotype FrontEndUseCase,
>> so
>> you can reference the activity graph in a use case via a tagged value.
>> This
>> feature allready worked with a pre M2 version of andromda (I tested it
>> that
>> time).
>>
>> Now I try to work with the current RC1 Snapshot or M3 release, but in
> both
>> cases I got the following exceptions:
>>
>> ERROR [AndroMDA:VALIDATION:ERROR] 1)
>>
> org.andromda.cartridges.bpm4struts.metafacades.StrutsJsp[Bpm4Struts::andro
>> palace::presentation::tickets::Ticketreservation::enter
>>
>> criteria]:Each name of a JSP action state must be unique in the
>> namespace
>> of a use case
>>
>> ERROR [AndroMDA:VALIDATION:ERROR] 2)
>>
> org.andromda.cartridges.bpm4struts.metafacades.StrutsJsp[Bpm4Struts::andro
>> palace::presentation::tickets::Ticketreservation::select
>>
>> show]:Each name of a JSP action state must be unique in the namespace of
> a
>> use case
>>
>> ERROR [AndroMDA:VALIDATION:ERROR] 3)
>>
> org.andromda.cartridges.bpm4struts.metafacades.StrutsUseCase[Bpm4Struts::a
>> ndropalace::presentation::tickets::Ticketreservation]:Each
>>
>> use-case needs one and only one activity graph.
>>
>> As soon as I "move" the activity graph in the namespace of the use case
> by
>> hand (via editing the xmi-file directly) the generation works fine.
>>
>> Is it possible that the OCL constraints for the bpm4stuts profile don't
>> account for the case that the activity graph doesn't reside in the
>> namespace of the use case but is referenced by a tagged value? My this
>> be
>> the cause for validation error #3, and #1 and #2 being consecutive
> faults?
>>
>> Any help would be very welcome!
>>
>> Regards
>> Stefan
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------------
>> SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
>> Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
>> Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
>> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
>> _______________________________________________
>> Andromda-user mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/andromda-user
>
>
>
>
>
>
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: 2005 Windows Mobile Application Contest
Submit applications for Windows Mobile(tm)-based Pocket PCs or Smartphones
for the chance to win $25,000 and application distribution. Enter today at
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idh82&alloc_id148&op=click
_______________________________________________
Andromda-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/andromda-user
