Wouter Zoons wrote:
this has been fixed a couple days back, did you try the latest snapshot ?


I just started an hour ago with 3.0-SNAPSHOT and am running maven wo '-o' so I should have an up-to-date set of jars right?


this must mean you're modeling your identifiers explicitely using the <<Identifier>> stereotype, yeah those cases still require you to specify the id even if the generator class isn't 'assigned'



I'll try it wo explicit id.

that should be easy to fix, but it requires a refactoring that should properly be tested first (currently the notion of 'assigned' identifiers only exists in the hibernate cartridge, we have to refactoring this into the uml metafacades)

-- Wouter



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: NEC IT Guy Games.
Get your fingers limbered up and give it your best shot. 4 great events, 4
opportunities to win big! Highest score wins.NEC IT Guy Games. Play to
win an NEC 61 plasma display. Visit http://www.necitguy.com/?r=20
_______________________________________________
Andromda-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/andromda-user



------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: NEC IT Guy Games. Get your fingers limbered up and give it your best shot. 4 great events, 4 opportunities to win big! Highest score wins.NEC IT Guy Games. Play to win an NEC 61 plasma display. Visit http://www.necitguy.com/?r=20 _______________________________________________ Andromda-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/andromda-user

Reply via email to