||> "Funny" idea... What about something like this: ||> ||> User <------ User2Role ----------> Role ||> | ||> | ||> | ||> V ||> User <------- User2Office -------> Office ||> ||> ||> User.primaryOffice ----------> User2Role ||> ||> ? ;-) ||> || || ||this would already do the trick IMO: || ||User <------ User2Role ----------> Role || | | || | | || | | || | V || L------[1]-> Office
[Ciesielski] So why wont' you make User.primaryOffice pointing to User2Role instead of Office? You won't have doubled association to Office and won't have to check if primaryOffice is pointing office with assigned role for this user... ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click _______________________________________________ Andromda-user mailing list Andromda-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/andromda-user
