Sorry if this topic has come up before.
I'm wondering if there would be any problem with adding a namespace parameter
that indicates the project is being compiled under java 5.
Eventually this could control code generation for java 5. But for the time
being, we get hundreds of annoying warnings about types not being declared on
collections. Adding '@SuppressWarnings("unchecked")' before type or method
declarations will get rid of these (at least under Eclipse, which supports that
annotation). Any problems with this idea?
I'm also guessing that it wouldn't be so hard (???) to modify the templates to
generate collection declarations with the types filled in, but maybe I'm wrong.
That would be the best thing :)
_________________________________________________________
Reply to the post : http://galaxy.andromda.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=3899#3899
Posting to http://forum.andromda.org/ is preferred over posting to the mailing
list!
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices
Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA
Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf
_______________________________________________
Andromda-user mailing list
Andromda-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/andromda-user
